felix winkelmann scripsit: > When you look for a generic "null" or "void" object, that is used for a > particular library, then any unique value is sufficient, whether immediate > or not.
I agree; however, this is not a matter of a particular library, but of a large number of libraries, not all of which have anything to do with databases. > As I already replied to Graham, immediacy vs. non-immediacy is > an implementation detail and shouldn't concern us here. I have already conceded this point. The issue is having a unique object universally available that is of a disjoint type. -- A mosquito cried out in his pain, John Cowan "A chemist has poisoned my brain!" http://www.ccil.org/~cowan The cause of his sorrow [EMAIL PROTECTED] Was para-dichloro- Diphenyltrichloroethane. (aka DDT) _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
