On Tue, 6 Apr 2010 17:11:25 -0300 Jeronimo Pellegrini <j...@aleph0.info> wrote:
>> I'd suggest naming the egg in a way it doesn't sound as general as >> "faster I/O primitives". Maybe it's just me, but when I read "fast-io", >> I instinctively think that Chicken's I/O primitives are slow and by >> using fast-io I'll get faster I/O for any case. Again, it's only a >> suggestion, maybe it's just me. > > Right! > > What would be more appropriate? > > "unsafe-io" > "fast-unsafe-io" > "unsafe-io-procedures" > "nonstandard-fst-io" How about "type-specific-io"? Best wishes. Mario _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
