On Apr 1, 2012, at 12:22 PM, Jim Ursetto wrote: > On Apr 1, 2012, at 11:15 AM, Matt Welland wrote: > >> Note that normalize-path is not the same as realpath and that although >> realpath would be nice to have calling the system realpath works just fine >> and so this is a suggestion and not a request .... > > What is "the system realpath"?
Specifically, I don't understand from your mail whether you have successfully bound realpath(3) in your own code, whether you want this binding to be added to the posix unit, or whether you wanted a reimplementation in pure Scheme. I'm quite confused, sorry. _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
