Hi Andy, On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 9:30 AM, Andy Bennett <andy...@ashurst.eu.org> wrote:
> Hi, > > Can anyone offer guidance on how to send a multipart/alternative mail > with hato? I'm trying to send HTML mail with a text/plain alternative. > > For my proof of concept I tried: > > ----- > (send-mail From: "Pat Andrews <p...@knodium.com>" > To: "Andy Pandy <andy...@knodium.com>" > Subject: "Hato Test" > Charset: "ISO-8859-1" > Attachments: '((Body: "Hello this is the first attachment") > (Body: "This is the second attachment"))) > ----- > > This results in a multipart mail where both parts show up in my mail > reader. > > I then tried: > > ----- > (send-mail From: "Pat Andrews <p...@knodium.com>" > To: "Andy Pandy <andy...@knodium.com>" > Subject: "Hato Test" > Charset: "ISO-8859-1" > Content-Type: "multipart/alternative" > Attachments: '((Body: "Hello this is the first attachment") > (Body: "This is the second attachment"))) > ----- > When specifying your own multiple Content-Type, you need to include the boundary: Content-Type: "multipart/alternative; boundary=xyzzy" Boundary: "xyzzy" [Ideally it should infer the boundary in this case, and it would also be nice to automatically generate the boundary when unspecified.] This should prevent everything falling out to the top-level as you described, though it may not generate quite what you want. You can log issues on hato.googlecode.com. If it's a bug I'll try to fix it, but feature requests will largely be pending the port to R7RS. > hato seems to generate MIME messages with a single boundary string. > Attachments may include nested attachments, which will result in nested multiparts with different boundaries. You should only need one top-level boundary in your case though. -- Alex
_______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
