On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 05:04:31PM +0200, Christian Kellermann wrote:
> * John Long <codeb...@inbox.lv> [130528 16:48]:
> > On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 04:36:11PM +0200, Christian Kellermann wrote:
> > > * John Long <codeb...@inbox.lv> [130528 16:25]:
> > > > Hi Christian,
> > > > 
> > > > Here's the part of the test that crashed. If you need the prior stuff 
> > > > just
> > > > let me know, I didn't want to post too hugely to the list!
> > > 
> > > Yes, some more info would be nice. Did you just download the 4.8.0.3
> > > tarball untarred it, ran make && make install && make check?
> > 
> > Yes, except I didn't know how to tell the makefile to use -O3 so I changed
> > the C_COMPILER_OPTIMIZATION_OPTIONS after the else in Makefile.linux to
> > match the line before the else.
> 
> This may indicate a compiler optimisation breaking assumptions in
> our code. Does it work for you when you leave the values as is?

I didn't dream this up, as you know the makefile has provisions for -Os and
-O3 so I ASSumed somebody tested that! ;-)

It builds fine under -Os, O2, and O3 but the tests fail here at -O2 and -O3.

Thanks.

/jl

_______________________________________________
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users

Reply via email to