You say, "Wouldn't that just be like Mozilla Firefox + NoScript?". No, as safe as IE6 with prompt for scripts and having a trusted sites list. Automatically run scripts on sites YOU trust and examine all others deciding on a site-per-site basis which you'll give permission to run scripts. Thanks.
On Sep 16, 5:38 am, "Alwin Garside" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Wouldn't that just be like Mozilla Firefox + NoScript? > > > > On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 11:35 PM, gbob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Allowing the user to set the browser security to allow them to set it > > to ask for permission to run any scripts (Java, Javascript, etc.) and > > to have a trusted sites list similar to the way IE works. > > > On Sep 15, 7:29 pm, "Ian Fette" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I'm not sure what the ask here is. We don't allow active-x to run. > > >> On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 7:23 PM, gbob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> > Hello: I currently use only IE 6 (I know, I know) because it has one > >> > of the most important security features that has prevented a number of > >> > infections recently. I have three separate OS partitions with XP on > >> > each. One is used for my non-web work with ALL data and most programs > >> > on another drive. Another is used for my normal Web work and has NO > >> > connection to ANY data; documents, projects, etc. And the last is a > >> > test partition setup the same way, to test security where I take more > >> > risks. So, on my test partition, in the last month, I was infested > >> > twice by a number of malware programs that got through all (numerous) > >> > defenses. My normal web partition is setup slightly differently. I > >> > use only IE and have ActiveX and scripts set to "Prompt" and add only > >> > a few sites I trust to the trusted sites list. Even the trusted sites > >> > prompt for permission when scripts from other sites are executed at > >> > that site (and I say no, which works fine). It has NEVER been > >> > infected. It's a pain, I know, but it's MUCH safer and would be great > >> > if Chrome had the same so it was at least as secure IE in that > >> > respect. I'll use Chrome for regular web access when it has it. > >> > Thanks. > > >> > May or may not apply... > >> > See:http://www.darkreading.com/document.asp?doc_id=162515 > >> > Report: Popular Web Attacks Go Stealth > > -- > Alwin "Yogarine" Garside > Development Lead > LinFox Serviços de Informatica LTDA.http://www.linfox.com.br > Phone: +55 (0xx)83 3333-9084 > Mobile: +55 (0xx)83 91275361 --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Chromium-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to chromium-dev@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
