Sadly, it's hard to block flash "popups" without breaking flash. I wish
there were a better answer. Some people have requested things like noflash,
I suspect that once we have an extension mechanism in place this would be a
good candidate for that.

On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 2:01 PM, gbob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>
> BTW, the only sites in my trusted zone are google, microsoft and just
> a few others.  I have yet to be infected by them.  They are VERY quick
> to fix vulnerabilities.
>
> On Sep 16, 1:36 pm, "Ian Fette" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The whole point though is that running or not running script on sites you
> > trust is not sufficient. E.g. you may trust myfavoritesite.com to run
> > script, but then tomorrow it gets hacked and starts including malicious
> > javascript. This is something that Safe Browsing (the anti-malware
> > protection built into Google Chrome) can help with, but is not something
> > that would be stopped if you say "I trust myfavoritesite.com to run
> script".
> > People are hacking sites you trust and that you visit. That's how they
> get
> > infections. They're not trying to hack sites that nobody visits.
> > This is not something that I think would be a useful feature from a
> security
> > perspective.
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 1:08 PM, gbob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > You say, "Wouldn't that just be like Mozilla Firefox + NoScript?".
> > > No, as safe as IE6 with prompt for scripts and having a trusted sites
> > > list.  Automatically run scripts on sites YOU trust and examine all
> > > others deciding on a site-per-site basis which you'll give permission
> > > to run scripts.  Thanks.
> >
> > > On Sep 16, 5:38 am, "Alwin Garside" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Wouldn't that just be like Mozilla Firefox + NoScript?
> >
> > > > On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 11:35 PM, gbob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > > > Allowing the user to set the browser security to allow them to set
> it
> > > > > to ask for permission to run any scripts (Java, Javascript, etc.)
> and
> > > > > to have a trusted sites list similar to the way IE works.
> >
> > > > > On Sep 15, 7:29 pm, "Ian Fette" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > >> I'm not sure what the ask here is. We don't allow active-x to run.
> >
> > > > >> On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 7:23 PM, gbob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > > >> > Hello: I currently use only IE 6 (I know, I know) because it has
> one
> > > > >> > of the most important security features that has prevented a
> number
> > > of
> > > > >> > infections recently.  I have three separate OS partitions with
> XP on
> > > > >> > each.  One is used for my non-web work with ALL data and most
> > > programs
> > > > >> > on another drive.  Another is used for my normal Web work and
> has NO
> > > > >> > connection to ANY data; documents, projects, etc.  And the last
> is a
> > > > >> > test partition setup the same way, to test security where I take
> > > more
> > > > >> > risks.  So, on my test partition, in the last month, I was
> infested
> > > > >> > twice by a number of malware programs that got through all
> > > (numerous)
> > > > >> > defenses.  My normal web partition is setup slightly
> differently.  I
> > > > >> > use only IE and have ActiveX and scripts set to "Prompt" and add
> > > only
> > > > >> > a few sites I trust to the trusted sites list. Even the trusted
> > > sites
> > > > >> > prompt for permission when scripts from other sites are executed
> at
> > > > >> > that site (and I say no, which works fine).  It has NEVER been
> > > > >> > infected.  It's a pain, I know, but it's MUCH safer and would be
> > > great
> > > > >> > if Chrome had the same so it was at least as secure IE in that
> > > > >> > respect.  I'll use Chrome for regular web access when it has it.
> > > > >> > Thanks.
> >
> > > > >> > May or may not apply...
> > > > >> > See:http://www.darkreading.com/document.asp?doc_id=162515
> > > > >> > Report: Popular Web Attacks Go Stealth
> >
> > > > --
> > > > Alwin "Yogarine" Garside
> > > > Development Lead
> > > > LinFox Serviços de Informatica LTDA.http://www.linfox.com.br
> > > > Phone: +55 (0xx)83 3333-9084
> > > > Mobile: +55 (0xx)83 91275361
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Chromium-dev" group.
To post to this group, send email to chromium-dev@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to