On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 3:32 PM, thetrueaplus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> > I know Microsoft has this interface. IWebBrowser2. > > http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa752127(VS.85).aspx<http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa752127%28VS.85%29.aspx> > > Gecko's ActiveX component implements this. What do people think? Should we implement a partial plug-in replacement for IWebBrowser2, similar to Mozilla's implementation, or go our own way? This page describes the interfaces that Mozilla implements: http://www.iol.ie/~locka/mozilla/control.htm I don't think they've added much, if any, additional capabilities since rolling it into XULRunner. If we choose to clone IWebBrowser2 we can always selectively implement and/or extend it. The advantages would be immediate access for people who use only the basic IWebBrowser2 capabilities (which is probably most of the user base), and the option to borrow COM code from XULRunner :-). --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Chromium-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to chromium-dev@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
