2009/6/21 PhistucK <phist...@gmail.com>
> Really? the statistics show that many people are using the app mode?Or did
> you mean web apps, as in web application websites?
>
I mean web applications like gmail, hotmail, zoho, shopping carts, etc etc.
But it's an unsubstantiated claim.....
Mike
>
> ☆PhistucK
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 21:03, Mike Belshe <mbel...@google.com> wrote:
>
>> I assume he's not a benchmark pro, but he did a decent job already. We
>> can nitpick his sampling methodology - but it won't change the result. He
>> is correct that many procs is far more memory consuming than single proc,
>> and we already knew this.
>> This is a tradeoff we made consciously and deliberately. When firefox
>> crashes, all tabs go down. When firefox memory is compromised (security),
>> all tabs are compromised. In chrome, we don't have those problems, but
>> instead use more RAM. Further, Chrome is also able to implement per-tab
>> prioritization, so that background tabs don't make foreground tabs go slow.
>> Firefox can't do that.
>> Lastly, lets bring the test back to reality. People don't visit 150
>> random home pages. They may have 20-30 tabs open, but many are
>> applications, with cookies, javascript state and much more than just the
>> "home page". When apps are in use, the memory gap between chrome and FF
>> shrinks a lot.
>>
>> Mike
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 10:46 AM, Dan Kegel <d...@kegel.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 10:22 AM, Mike Belshe<mbel...@google.com> wrote:
>>> > First off - kudos to the author for posting the source and steps to
>>> > reproduce! Most don't do that!
>>> >
>>> > Second, the author is basically right. Since he's running on Vista,
>>> its a
>>> > bit hard to tell whether his stats included shared memory or not; using
>>> the
>>> > default memory statistic ("Memory (Private Working Set)") is actually a
>>> > pretty good measure to just sum. But he doesn't say which measurement
>>> he
>>> > used.
>>>
>>> Wait, why doesn't his program itself do the summing?
>>> (I don't see it in there.)
>>> Wouldn't that get rid of the ambiguity?
>>> How hard would it be to add that and repost?
>>> - Dan
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> >
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe:
http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
