PNG is lossless, so we should be good there. Avi
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 4:30 PM, Aaron Boodman <a...@chromium.org> wrote: > On this same subject -- do we do any lossy compression in our png > encoding? I think we should *not*. Developers will be peeved if their > carefully compressed images come out looking different because of our > internal implementation details. > > - a > > On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 1:17 PM, Avi Drissman<a...@google.com> wrote: > > Nailed: http://codereview.chromium.org/149473 > > > > Avi > > > > On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 4:15 PM, Amanda Walker <ama...@chromium.org> > wrote: > >> > >> On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 3:54 PM, Avi Drissman<a...@google.com> wrote: > >> > Two things. First, this doesn't happen on Windows. Second, how do you > >> > get an > >> > image shifted one pixel to the right? On the Mac, ImageDecoder::Decode > >> > uses > >> > the webkit decoders which on the Mac return a CGImage, and then > >> > gfx::CGImageToSkBitmap is called. > >> > >> Well, all platforms use the webkit decoders (as of Darin's refactoring > >> in January), they just return different the image differently. > >> gfx::CGImageToSkBitmap does sound like a likely culprit, though :-). > >> > >> --Amanda > > > > > > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
