I tend to think incognito mode as a personal (and very private) decision.
As a result, I'd tend to prefer that it be very difficult to leak such
status further than absolutely necessary. Allowing your proxy provider to
detect this status seems like a violation of the "need to know," but perhaps
that because I see a proxy provider as an ISP in the common case. If I
thought I could "trust" my proxy provider, perhaps I'd be more open about
this status.
...but perhaps that was not the best example of your need for the API
access??
Jim
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 11:35 AM, Peter <peter.j.obr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Can someone explain the scope of javascript calls available within PAC
> files that chrome parses?
>
> What I'm getting at is, can we use the chrome api javascript calls
> within PAC files?
>
> Why would you want/need this? First thought is to determine if the
> browser is in incognito mode or not, but there may be other
> applications.
> >
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe:
http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
