http://crbug.com/5022 http://crbug.com/5023 http://crbug.com/5024 http://crbug.com/5026 http://crbug.com/5027
Grab any of these. A lot of people complained but almost nobody dared (except tommi) contributing to reduce the dependency. So please stop talking about this unless this is to contribute changes. Until there is a good-enough replacement for CWindowImpl and CComCoClass, I'm against refusing to add more dependency on ATL. (hint hint start there) Thanks for not continuing this OT thread, M-A On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 1:19 AM, Dan Kegel<d...@kegel.com> wrote: > > Yeah. How about a presubmit check? (only half joking) > > On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 9:41 PM, PhistucK<phist...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I am either wrong or just out of context here, but O3D has added another >> mentioning of ATL in their code - >> http://www.google.com/codesearch/p?hl=en&sa=N&cd=8&ct=rc#h0RrPvyPu-c/o3d/plugin/npapi_host_control/win/stream_operation.h&q=package:src.chromium.org%20atl >> Should any additions not be prevented? >> ☆PhistucK >> >> >> On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 22:32, Ben Goodger (Google) <b...@chromium.org> >> wrote: >>> >>> I would like to. It's just a matter of time and effort... and it's not >>> been a top priority for me to date. Please feel free to gather >>> requirements and develop a plan however. >>> >>> -Ben >> >> >> > >> > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
