BTW, would we want this to be temporary? I was thinking so, but then again,
being able to suppress a pixel failure separately from the layout failure
might be useful.
Avi
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 3:24 PM, Avi Drissman <a...@google.com> wrote:
> I'm new to the test runner (and to python in general). Can you give me a
> pointer where I should start?
>
> Avi
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 3:22 PM, Dirk Pranke <dpra...@google.com> wrote:
>
>> No, there's no way to do that but it would be easy enough to add.
>>
>> -- Dirk
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 12:16 PM, Avi Drissman <a...@google.com> wrote:
>> > I've been looking into the pixel test situation on the Mac, and it isn't
>> bad
>> > at all. Of ~5300 tests that have png results, we're failing ~800, most
>> of
>> > which fall into huge buckets of easily-separable fail.
>> >
>> > Is there a way to specify that we're expecting an image compare to fail
>> but
>> > still want the layout to succeed? We don't want to turn off the tests
>> > entirely while we fix them and run the chance of breaking something that
>> > layout would have caught.
>> >
>> > Avi
>> >
>> > >> >
>> >
>>
>
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe:
http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
