(using the write from address)
This sounds fine to me. It's like how we handle CRASH and TIMEOUT as
special failures.
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 12:44 PM, Dimitri Glazkov <dglaz...@chromium.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 12:33 PM, Ojan Vafai <o...@chromium.org> wrote:
>> +pam, tc, darin in case they disagree with what I'm saying here.
>>
>> Also a bunch of current expectations would need to be modified. All
>> the cases where there is currently FAIL would need to be changed to
>> either FAIL or IMAGE or both if it's a text and image failure. You
>> should be able to get most of the data for this by looking at the
>> layout test dashboard. The only exception is you won't be able to
>> distinguish tests that fail both image and text from tests that only
>> fail image.
>>
>> A short-term solution could be to leave FAIL meaning IMAGE and/or TEXT
>> and adding IMAGE and TEXT for image-only and text-only failures. Then
>> we can gradually excise the FAIL lines from text_expectations.
>
> I think is a great plan.
>
> :DG<
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe:
http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
