On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 2:24 PM, Peter Kasting <pkast...@google.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 11:20 AM, Jacob Mandelson <ja...@mandelson.org>
> wrote:
>
>> If something extra in an expression is a common case, I've sometimes
>> seen it done like:
>> return DoWork(&foo) POSIX_ONLY(&& DoWork(&posix_specific));
>> where POSIX_ONLY will expand to nothing or its argument.
>> It's ugly, but compact.
>
>
> The Google C++ Style Guide says to avoid macros when there is a non-macro
> way to do the same thing.
>
Sanity says that too.
Scott's technique is the best. If you can't figure out what's happening by
glancing at the code, it's not code, it's assembly.
M-A
(grr)
--
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe:
http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
