*I agree, though I cannot really see it happening.***The whole point of choosing a rendering engine (for most of the browsers, anyway) is to use it. Maybe some extensions will let you have the "View in IE" mode (like FireFox has through extensions), but generic support of this feature will probably not see the light of day as it contradicts the whole notion of having a standards compliant web (since other browsers, like older IEs (or maybe even new ones) were (and maybe are) not that standards compliant as Opera 9.5\Chrome\FireFox 3(\IE 8?)). Microsoft brought in this generic feature in IE 8 so they will basically not screw themselves up because of the lack of real standards compliant engines in older IEs.
On the other hand, by bringing in that option, IE has *moved the web a little forward* (and backwards, since it allows site to keep being not standards compliant) since you can now browse to older or not standards compliant (IE standard compliant websites) and still see them properly. *And moving the web forward is exactly what Chrome was designed to do, per se.* Just my two cents. ☆PhistucK On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 18:46, Eduardo Tondin <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'm websystem developer and I found in Chrome the best tools for > debuging my result codes. All suggestions written so far are great, of > course with we want to widespread the use of it, the browser must try > to render the result pages as being rendered on other browsers like > Internet Explorer, FireFox, Netscape, Safari, Opera and so on. The > idea is already embedded in Netscape which allows you render any page > as any installed browser. We may have installed all of them, but we > won't like to run different browsers per day just to keep it on use. > On the other hand, we want to use a unique browser capable to render > as any other browser installed. > > This is not a big deal! Widespread the use NOW! > > Thanks you and keep your great work so far. > > On 5 fev, 18:46, jordan <[email protected]> wrote: > > I have used every version of Chrome since it was released in September > > and have tested 2 dev releases. I, however, have found one very large > > missing component, built in proxy support. Chrome forwards you to the > > built in internet proxy settings, which are needless to say dismal. It > > would be very nice if it had a useful tool like Firefox in which you > > could use all types of proxies. > > > > Second a feature that would make this complete for web developers like > > myself, a comprehensive ftp tool. Like the extension fireftp for > > Firefox that allows you to upload files and view them in a fast, > > tabbed environment. If you could include these two features you would > > be more able to achieve the support of the advanced community. > > > > Thank You and Keep Working Team > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Chromium Discussion mailing list: [email protected] View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-discuss -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
