I guess the names will grow identical some day, what I mentioned before (the regular XMLHttpRequest) is part of the Extensions system (and maybe also part of the User Scripts, but I have not verified that). It is not considered as part of the Greasemonkey support. So, officially (and not officially, since you have to add a command line switch to make User Scripts work in the first place), there is no support for native Greasemonkey API.
I am not sure an official support is planned anyhow and I am really not sure the API will be persistent. ☆PhistucK On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 18:18, Mark Malewski <[email protected]> wrote: > Phistuck, > Thanks for the reply, I had just sent out a post about 2 seconds before I > received your reply. > > Is there any reason why they are using different command names (that are > incompatible with the Firefox/Greasemonkey command names)? > > It would seem to make sense to keep the commands identical, so that > Greasemonkey scripts (for Firefox) can just be downloaded and executed in > Chromium (without having to modify the scripts). > > > > > On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 10:12 AM, PhistucK <[email protected]> wrote: > >> The syntax is different and it is only a temporary state, but >> GM_xmlhttpRequest (as you stated) is kind of implemented.Try using a >> XMLHttpRequest from an extension - it will allow cross origin requests (if >> that is the purpose of this function). >> >> ☆PhistucK >> >> >> >> On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 16:59, Mark Malewski <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> >>> I've tried installing the latest Google Chrome (2.0.172.33) and I've >>> also installed the latest Chromium 3.0.193.0 (20244) build as of July >>> 8, 2009, hoping to use Greasemonkey in Chrome or Chromium. >>> >>> I've been reading thousands of posts on various websites, about >>> Greasemonkey support in Google Chrome/Chromium, but none of the >>> scripts we've tried using function properly. >>> >>> What is the status of Greasemonkey support in Chrome/Chromium, what >>> functions have already been implemented, and what is the status of >>> support for the following Greasemonkey functions: >>> >>> Add support for: >>> >>> GM_registerMenuCommand >>> GM_getValue >>> GM_listValues >>> GM_deleteValue >>> GM_setValue >>> GM_xmlhttpRequest >>> >>> These six GM_ functions are the only functions that we really need at >>> the moment that don't seem to be currently supported, is there any way >>> that these functions could possibly be added to Chromium, so that we >>> can begin using Greasemonkey in Chromium? >>> >>> Thank-you for all that you do, >>> >>> Mark >>> >>> >>> >>> >> > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Chromium Discussion mailing list: [email protected] View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-discuss -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
