I believe this would be http://crbug.com/367
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 3:41 PM, PhistucK <[email protected]> wrote: > You can start by filing a issue at crbug.com. See if it does not get a > "WontFix" or any rejections here. If they say they are willing to accept > patches for this, you can start working on it. > > Reply with the issue URL here. > > ☆PhistucK > > > On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 22:16, Rojer <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hello, fellow Chromium users and devs. >> >> This is probably my biggest gripe with Chrome, and i can stand no >> longer... >> >> History searches by URL from the Omnibar are awful! >> If you recall part of a URL, hardly ever does Omnibox return useful >> results. >> >> Suppose you have http://some-site.com/potentially/long/url/ >> >> The *only* way to get Chrome to dig up that url seems to be to start >> entering "some-site.com/p" etc. >> If you happen to recall any other part of the url, searches or >> suggestions will bring up nothing. >> This is very bad, especially considering how good Firfox is at this in >> comparison: it will start suggesting as you type any part of the url >> whatsoever. Chrome, on the other hand, seems to be tokenizing URLs on >> slashes (not sure about this, though). >> if you type "long/url" it will treat "long" as a hostname and completely >> give up on any suggestions. >> in other words - really, really bad experience searching parts of URLs. >> give me arbitrary substring searches! ok, maybe not arbitrary substring. >> if Chrome insists on tokenization, fine. but i should be able to find >> this history entry by typing e.g. "long url" or "potentially long". this >> doesn't happen at the moment. >> >> Can something be done about this? >> I am willing to spend some time and contribute code towards fixing this >> unless it'd be overly complex in the current architecture. >> >> Thanks >> > -- Chromium Discussion mailing list: [email protected] View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-discuss
