Why would you not create the solution by yourself?

☆PhistucK


On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 16:48, rojer <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Dec 3, 5:17 am, Chen Yong <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I believe this would behttp://crbug.com/367
>
> sort of. although i don't know what machine learning has to with this,
> at all.
> give me substring search, that's all i really want.
>
> ok, i voted for that bug. but no solution in sight, it seems...
>
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 3:41 PM, PhistucK <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > You can start by filing a issue at crbug.com. See if it does not get a
> > > "WontFix" or any rejections here. If they say they are willing to
> accept
> > > patches for this, you can start working on it.
> >
> > > Reply with the issue URL here.
> >
> > > ☆PhistucK
> >
> > > On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 22:16, Rojer <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > >> Hello, fellow Chromium users and devs.
> >
> > >> This is probably my biggest gripe with Chrome, and i can stand no
> > >> longer...
> >
> > >> History searches by URL from the Omnibar are awful!
> > >> If you recall part of a URL, hardly ever does Omnibox return useful
> > >> results.
> >
> > >> Suppose you havehttp://some-site.com/potentially/long/url/
> >
> > >> The *only* way to get Chrome to dig up that url seems to be to start
> > >> entering "some-site.com/p" etc.
> > >> If you happen to recall any other part of the url, searches or
> > >> suggestions will bring up nothing.
> > >> This is very bad, especially considering how good Firfox is at this in
> > >> comparison: it will start suggesting as you type any part of the url
> > >> whatsoever. Chrome, on the other hand, seems to be tokenizing URLs on
> > >> slashes (not sure about this, though).
> > >> if you type "long/url" it will treat "long" as a hostname and
> completely
> > >> give up on any suggestions.
> > >> in other words - really, really bad experience searching parts of
> URLs.
> > >> give me arbitrary substring searches! ok, maybe not arbitrary
> substring.
> > >> if Chrome insists on tokenization, fine. but i should be able to find
> > >> this history entry by typing e.g. "long url" or "potentially long".
> this
> > >> doesn't happen at the moment.
> >
> > >> Can something be done about this?
> > >> I am willing to spend some time and contribute code towards fixing
> this
> > >> unless it'd be overly complex in the current architecture.
> >
> > >> Thanks
> >
> >
>
> --
> Chromium Discussion mailing list: [email protected]
> View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe:
>    http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-discuss
>

-- 
Chromium Discussion mailing list: [email protected] 
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: 
    http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-discuss

Reply via email to