On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 2:36 PM, Colin Bleckner <co...@xmarks.com> wrote: > > Right now it appears that content scripts don't have access to any sort > of localStorage. Just to make sure, is this by design? I figure it > won't have access to the extension's local storage, but maybe it could > have some sort of local storage access on the current page?
It is by design. I would like for content scripts to eventually have access to the extension's storage, but until that time, it seemed confusing and weird for content scripts to have access to the page's local storage. So for now, we have no local storage at all for content scripts. - a --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Chromium-extensions" group. To post to this group, send email to chromium-extensions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to chromium-extensions+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-extensions?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---