It would be awesome to have some sort of local or session storage available some day. Sending messages to the extension to get preference data (and then shoving them in a cookie for storage) is far from idea.
Colin Aaron Boodman wrote: > On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 2:36 PM, Colin Bleckner <co...@xmarks.com> wrote: > >> Right now it appears that content scripts don't have access to any sort >> of localStorage. Just to make sure, is this by design? I figure it >> won't have access to the extension's local storage, but maybe it could >> have some sort of local storage access on the current page? >> > > It is by design. I would like for content scripts to eventually have > access to the extension's storage, but until that time, it seemed > confusing and weird for content scripts to have access to the page's > local storage. > > So for now, we have no local storage at all for content scripts. > > - a > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Chromium-extensions" group. To post to this group, send email to chromium-extensi...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to chromium-extensions+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-extensions?hl=.
