That command line flag did the trick for js-test-driver. Thanks Daniel! On Jan 12, 2:28 pm, Daniel Wagner-Hall <dawag...@gmail.com> wrote: > Would starting Chrome with the command line flag > --disable-web-security do what you need? > > On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 10:05 PM, Min Huang <reti...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I am writing a pretty big extension and I need a means of testing it. > > The tests will probably need to make cross origin XHR's and perhaps > > access chrome.* APIs. > > > In Firefox, I settled upon js-test-driver along with 'hacks' like > > requesting UniversalXPConnect privileges along with setting the > > signed.applets.codebase_principal_support preference to true. This > > meant that Firefox would happily execute any 'untrusted' javascript > > that js-test-driver sent over to it and I could have automated tests > > (though I felt a little dirty inside). > > > Now I'm trying to accomplish something similar in Chrome. > > Unfortunately, using js-test-driver like this just won't work because > > Chrome has no about:config options that let me tweak these settings > > (or if it did, I wouldn't know where to look or what it would be > > called). > > > However, I've also taken a step back and decided the only good reason > > I had for using js-test-driver was that I could have venkman open in > > Firefox while tests ran (if I started up venkman and my tests at the > > same time, I could not guarantee that venkman would start before my > > tests started). Now, this is Chrome and not Firefox, and I've got > > better dev tools at my disposal (especially in terms of a debugger), > > so I'm wondering if other extension developers can help me out: what > > are my options for testing frameworks that give me extension level > > privileges? > > > I've ruled out js-test-driver for the aforementioned reasons, and I'm > > about to give up on jsunit; here's the error I get when I try to run a > > test: > > > Unsafe JavaScript attempt to access frame with URL chrome://chromewebdata/ > > from frame with URL chrome-extension:// > > mbcfjgkghaamjmddjaodbckhjoabidde/testRunner.html?testPage=/ > > testPage.html. Domains, protocols and ports must match. > > > Anybody else have success with other frameworks? > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Chromium-extensions" group. > > To post to this group, send email to chromium-extensi...@googlegroups.com. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > chromium-extensions+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > > For more options, visit this group > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/chromium-extensions?hl=en.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Chromium-extensions" group. To post to this group, send email to chromium-extensi...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to chromium-extensions+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-extensions?hl=en.
