First, disable systemd-timesyncd if you're using chrony: *sudo systemctl
disable --now systemd-timesyncd*

Second, enable chrony, pretty sure it isn't enabled by default after
install: *sudo systemctl enable chrony*

Why do you want to SHM 0 (non-PPS-corrected) NMEA time, instead of SHM 1 or
/var/run/chrony.ttyAMA0.sock?

On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 9:36 PM Ryan Govostes <rgovos...@whoi.edu> wrote:

> Thanks, I removed the offset and delay so the reference clock
> configuration is now:
>
>         refclock SHM 0 refid GPS precision 1e-1
>         refclock PPS /dev/pps0 refid PPS
>
> My intention is to have GPS set the system date and time and then have the
> PPS signal keep it from drifting.
>
> After applying this, I ran again and am now getting:
>
>         MS Name/IP address         Stratum Poll Reach LastRx Last sample
>
> ===============================================================================
>         #x GPS                           0   4   377    16   +587us[
> +587us] +/-  100ms
>         #x PPS                           0   4   160    82   -128ms[
> -128ms] +/-  759ns
>
> The #x suggests that “time may be in error.” However I am still seeing
> gpsd work (monitored via cgps) and the PPS device still appears to be
> working (according to ppstest).
>
> Furthermore timedatectl suggests that the system clock is not synchronized:
>
>         $ timedatectl status
>         Local time: Tue 2020-09-15 18:34:48 UTC
>         Universal time: Tue 2020-09-15 18:34:48 UTC
>         RTC time: n/a
>         Time zone: Etc/UTC (UTC, +0000)
>         System clock synchronized: no
>         systemd-timesyncd.service active: yes
>         RTC in local TZ: no
>
> What appears to be the problem?
>
> Ryan
>
> > On Sep 15, 2020, at 12:47 PM, Bill Unruh <un...@physics.ubc.ca> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > William G. Unruh __| Canadian Institute for|____ Tel: +1(604)822-3273
> > Physics&Astronomy _|___ Advanced Research _|____ Fax: +1(604)822-5324
> > UBC, Vancouver,BC _|_ Program in Cosmology |____ un...@physics.ubc.ca
> > Canada V6T 1Z1 ____|____ and Gravity ______|_
> https://nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.theory.physics.ubc.ca%2F&amp;data=02%7C01%7Crgovostes%40whoi.edu%7C054736ed4c39434c82db08d8599714d3%7Cd44c5cc6d18c46cc8abd4fdf5b6e5944%7C0%7C0%7C637357852718387997&amp;sdata=qHAUE4iPB4YLvLVCtFetR33HnDjEowrOa%2FpWLANdNpE%3D&amp;reserved=0
> >
> > On Tue, 15 Sep 2020, Ryan Govostes wrote:
> >
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> I am setting up chronyd on an embedded Linux device to synchronize the
> system clock using a GPS module. The GPS device sends NMEA strings over the
> character device /dev/ttyAMA1 and I have also configured /dev/pps0, both of
> which appear to be working OK.
> >>
> >> The system is running Ubuntu 18.04 and the latest package versions are
> chronyd 3.2 and gpsd 3.17.
> >>
> >> I configured gpsd to listen to the serial device and then added these
> lines to my chrony.conf:
> >>
> >>      refclock SHM 0 refid GPS precision 1e-1 offset 0.9999 delay 0.2
> >
> > Why those figures for ooffset? That is 1 sec offset. NMEA is not that
> bad.
> >
> >
> >>      refclock PPS /dev/pps0 refid PPS
> >>
> >> When I run `chronyc sources` they both seem to be kind of working:
> >>
> >>      210 Number of sources = 2
> >>      MS Name/IP address         Stratum Poll Reach LastRx Last sample
> >>
> ===============================================================================
> >>      #- GPS                           0   4   377    12   +128ms[
> +128ms] +/-  200ms
> >>      #* PPS                           0   4   377    12     +6ns[
> +119ns] +/-  203ns
> >>
> >> However it looks like the GPS source is “not combined”. Is this a
> degraded state, e.g., it is using one of these two sources?
> >
> > Why would one want to combine GPS with PPS. PPS is good to the nanosecond
> > level. GPS toabut 100 ms -- that is almost a  million times worse. It
> would be like combining your wristwatch with some clock which says "its
> > spring so it must be April".
> >
> >>
> >> Also, I am not sure why the LastRx from the PPS (or frankly either)
> ticks upwards so long—shouldn’t it constantly be receiving updates?
> >
> > Yout tell it that POLL is 4 which means 16 seconds. So every 16 seconds
> that
> > clock is read. The driver massages the input ( once a second) to get rid
> of
> > obvious outliers but reports to chrony once every 16 seconds. Note it is
> a bad
> > idea to reduce the poll even further. Then obvious ouliers are not
> thrown out,
> > and the ability to determine the rate of the clock is degraded.
> >
> >>
> >> I am just using the precision / offset / delay figures that several
> examples use. Is there documentation on calibrating these values?
> >
> > Get rid of the offset and delay. The GPS is useless except for setting
> actual
> > number of the seconds.
> >
> >>
> >> Finally, I read that using Unix sockets rather that shared memory is
> preferable, but my chronyd does not seem to create those sockets.
> >
> > Why is it better? Leave things as they are. With PPS your time will be
> > accurate to microseconds just as things are now. Do you need any better
> time?
> > If you do need time to nanoseconds, then you will really have to throw
> away
> > your computer (its ability to read interrupts is only at the microsecond
> > level) and begin compensating for propagation delays in your gps unit,
> and
> > also the sawtooth offset on the ns level due to your gps receiver
> innards. But
> > then, why would you want to know the time to 1 billionth of a second?
>
>

Reply via email to