--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], "Dr.Syed.S. 
Ahmed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Thomas Wilner
Los Angeles Times
February 26, 2006

THE AMERICAN PRISON CAMP at Guantanamo Bay is on the southeast corner 
of Cuba, a sliver of land the United States has occupied since 1903. 
Long ago, it was irrigated from lakes on the other side of the 
island, but Cuban President Fidel Castro cut off the water supply 
years ago. So today, Guantanamo produces its own water from a 30-year-
old desalination plant. The water has a distinct yellow tint. All 
Americans drink bottled water imported by the planeload. Until 
recently, prisoners drank the yellow water.

The prison overlooks the sea, but the ocean cannot be seen by 
prisoners. Guard towers and stadium lights loom along the perimeter. 
On my last visit, we were escorted by young, solemn military guards 
whose nameplates on their shirts were taped over so that prisoners 
could not identify them. 

Very few outsiders are allowed to see the prisoners. The government 
has orchestrated some carefully controlled tours for the media and 
members of Congress, but has repeatedly refused to allow these 
visitors, representatives of the United Nations, human rights groups 
or nonmilitary doctors and psychiatrists to meet or speak with 
prisoners. So far, the only outsiders who have done so are 
representatives of the International Committee of the Red Cross — who 
are prohibited by their own rules from disclosing what they find — 
and lawyers for the prisoners.

I am one of those lawyers. I represent six Kuwaiti prisoners, each of 
whom has now spent nearly four years at Guantanamo. It took me 2 1/2 
years to gain access to my clients, but now I have visited the prison 
camp 11 times in the last 14 months. What I have witnessed is a cruel 
and eerie netherworld of concrete and barbed wire that has become a 
daily nightmare for the nearly 500 people swept up after 9/11 who 
have been imprisoned without charges or trial for more than four 
years. It is truly our American gulag.

On my most recent trip three weeks ago, after signing a log sheet and 
submitting our bags to a search, my colleagues and I were taken 
through two tall, steel-mesh gates into the interior of the prison 
camp. 

We interviewed our clients in Camp Echo, one of several camps where 
prisoners are interrogated. We entered a room about 13 feet square 
and divided in half by a wall of thick steel mesh. On one side was a 
table where the prisoner would sit for our interviews, his feet 
shackled to a steel eyelet cemented to the floor. On the other side 
were a shower and a cell just like the ones in which prisoners are 
ordinarily confined. In their cells, prisoners sleep on a metal shelf 
against the wall, which is flanked by a toilet and sink. They are 
allowed a thin foam mattress and a gray cotton blanket. 

The Pentagon's files on the six Kuwaiti prisoners we represent reveal 
that none was captured on a battlefield or accused of engaging in 
hostilities against the U.S. The prisoners claim that they were taken 
into custody by Pakistani and Afghan warlords and turned over to the 
U.S. for bounties ranging from $5,000 to $25,000 — a claim confirmed 
by American news reports. We have obtained copies of bounty leaflets 
distributed in Afghanistan and Pakistan by U.S. forces promising 
rewards — "enough to feed your family for life" — for any "Arab 
terrorist" handed over.

The files include only the flimsiest accusations or hearsay that 
would never stand up in court. The file on one prisoner indicated 
that he had been seen talking to two suspected Al Qaeda members on 
the same day — at places thousands of miles apart. The 
primary "evidence" against another was that he was captured wearing a 
particular Casio watch, "which many terrorists wear." Oddly, the same 
watch was being worn by the U.S. military chaplain, a Muslim, at 
Guantanamo.

When I first met my clients, they had not seen or spoken with their 
families for more than three years, and they had been questioned 
hundreds of times. Several were suspicious of us; they told me that 
they had been interrogated by people who claimed to be their lawyers 
but who turned out not to be. So we had DVDs made, on which members 
of their families told them who we were and that we could be trusted. 
Several cried on seeing their families for the first time in years. 
One had become a father since he was detained and had never before 
seen his child. One noticed his father was not on the DVD, and we had 
to tell him that his father had died. 

Most prisoners are kept apart, although some can communicate through 
the steel mesh or concrete walls that separate their cells. They 
exercise alone, some only at night. They had not seen sunlight for 
months — an especially cruel tactic in a tropical climate. One 
prisoner told me, "I have spent almost every moment of the last three 
years, and eaten every meal, here in this small cell which is my 
bathroom." Other than the Koran, prisoners had nothing to read. As a 
result of our protests, some have been given books. 

Every prisoner I've interviewed claims to have been badly beaten and 
subjected to treatment that only could be called torture, by 
Americans, from the first day of U.S. captivity in Pakistan and 
Afghanistan. They said they were hung by their wrists and beaten, 
hung by their ankles and beaten, stripped naked and paraded before 
female guards, and given electric shocks. At least three claimed to 
have been beaten again upon arrival in Guantanamo. One of my clients, 
Fayiz Al Kandari, now 27, said his ribs were broken during an 
interrogation in Pakistan. I felt the indentation in his ribs. "Beat 
me all you want, just give me a hearing," he said he told his 
interrogators. 

Another prisoner, Fawzi Al Odah, 25, is a teacher who left Kuwait 
City in 2001 to work in Afghan, then Pakistani, schools. After 9/11, 
he and four other Kuwaitis were invited to dinner by a Pakistani 
tribal leader and then sold by him into captivity, according to their 
accounts, later confirmed by Newsweek and ABC News. 

On Aug. 8, 2005, Fawzi, in desperation, went on a hunger strike to 
assert his innocence and to protest being imprisoned for four years 
without charges. He said he wanted to defend himself against any 
accusations, or die. He told me that he had heard U.S. congressmen 
had returned from tours of Guantanamo saying that it was a Caribbean 
resort with great food. "If I eat, I condone these lies," Fawzi said. 

At the end of August, after Fawzi fainted in his cell, guards began 
to force-feed him through tubes pushed up his nose into his stomach. 
At first, the tubes were inserted for each feeding and then removed 
afterward. Fawzi told me that this was very painful. When he tried to 
pull out the tubes, he was strapped onto a stretcher with his head 
held by many guards, which was even more painful.

By mid-September, the force-feeding had been made more humane. 
Feeding tubes were left in and the formula pumped in. Still, when I 
saw Fawzi, a tube was protruding from his nose. Drops of blood 
dripped as we talked. He dabbed at it with a napkin. 

We asked for Fawzi's medical records so we could monitor his weight 
and his health. Denied. The only way we could learn how Fawzi was 
doing was to visit him each month, which we did. When we visited him 
in November, his weight had dropped from 140 pounds to 98 pounds. 
Specialists in enteral feeding advised us that the continued drop in 
his weight and other signs indicated that the feeding was being 
conducted incompetently. We asked that Fawzi be transferred to a 
hospital. Again, the government refused.

When we saw Fawzi in December, his weight had stabilized at about 110 
pounds. The formulas had been changed, and he was being force-fed by 
medical personnel rather than by guards.

When I met with Fawzi three weeks ago, the tubes were out of his 
nose. I told him I was thankful that after five months he had ended 
his hunger strike. He looked at me sadly and said, "They tortured us 
to make us stop." At first, he said, they punished him by taking away 
his "comfort items" one by one: his blanket, his towel, his long 
pants, his shoes. They then put him in isolation. When this failed to 
persuade him to end the hunger strike, he said, an officer came to 
him Jan. 9 to announce that any detainee who refused to eat would be 
forced onto "the chair." The officer warned that recalcitrant 
prisoners would be strapped into a steel device that pulled their 
heads back, and that the tubes would be forced in and wrenched out 
for each feeding. "We're going to break this hunger strike," the 
officer told him.

Fawzi said he heard the prisoner next door screaming and warning him 
to give up the strike. He decided that he wasn't "on strike to be 
tortured." He said those who continued on the hunger strike not only 
were strapped in "the chair" but were left there for hours; he 
believes that guards fed them not only nutrients but also diuretics 
and laxatives to force them to defecate and urinate on themselves in 
the chair. 

After less than two weeks of this treatment, the strike was over. Of 
the more than 80 strikers at the end of December, Fawzi said only 
three or four were holding out. As a result of the strike, however, 
prisoners are now getting a meager ration of bottled water.

Fawzi said eating was the only aspect of life at Guantanamo he could 
control; forcing him to end the hunger strike stripped him of his 
last means of protesting his unjust imprisonment. Now, he said, he 
feels "hopeless."

The government continues to deny that there is any injustice at 
Guantanamo. But I know the truth.

Thomas Wilner is a partner at Shearman & Sterling, which has been 
representing Kuwaiti prisoners in Guantanamo since early 2002.

--- End forwarded message ---






Complete archives at http://www.sitbot.net/

Please let us stay on topic and be civil. 

OM
 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cia-drugs/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to