Perspective is a law of the universe. Everywhere, close things look bigger than far away things. It is as simple as a barjoke. Put your Thumb up by your nose. It's bigger than a doorway across the room. As far away as you can reach, your thumb is about the size of the door knob and it's frame.
Close planes look bigger too. If there had been a plane in the first hit footage, it would have looked larger than the planeshape hole in every frame before the hit. It would have dominated the frame. Instead, nada except for a little divebombing thingie(s) up in the corner that are never, never never the size of a plane. They are the size of what looks like a window-washing setup on the corner. About the size of a car. http://missilegate.com is still completely planeless, with explosions arising from several different places, gray explosive clouds of aerosolized thermite being created by small uav drones like the cia brags about. For the second hit, they did basically the same thing, complete with explosions on the opposite side of the building first, except they pasted a photoshop origin plane, or in some instances where the plane vanishes behind the building, these were live insertion shots from pool cameras they conveniently set up and gave the footage to all networks. The second hit plane is a cartoon. Morgan Reynolds settles that question. http://nomoregames.net/index.php?page=911&subpage1=we_have_holes It cannot flaunt laws of nature and be a real plane.. It acts just like a Flight Simulator Simulation, the way it vanishes like a ghost. http://thewebfairy.com/911/ghostplane/vanishment The Official Conspiracy Theory depends on a flat world where Roadrunner would feel right at home, cos only cartoons get to ignore perspective. Perspective works through glasses, lenses, mirrors, at distances as close as your thumb and in the universe beyond the stars, always always things look bigger close up than they do far away, and if there were a plane in the first hit footage, even if it was fuzzy, it would have been so big you could see little of the front of the building; Theoretically, the smallest it ever appeared was three quarters of the building across.\ Mark S Bilk wrote: > In the days leading up to this, I had refuted many of Webfairy's > and Holmgren's central lies, e.g., that the image in the Naudet > video doesn't look like a plane (it looks exactly like a 767 seen > through that out-of-focus camera), and that a soft aluminum plane > can't break through steel (the planes were hard, tough aluminum > alloy, and had 100 times as much kinetic energy per pound as the > metal in a 57 mph automobile). So they fell back on lies and > personal attacks, which were so transparently false that I ignored > them. Complete archives at http://www.sitbot.net/ Please let us stay on topic and be civil. OM Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cia-drugs/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
