Sean wants to do away with the nazi dot inside neocon circle or roundtable, or "pied piper and patsy stand-off armor", as Kris and I are saying. It is easiest to make Antony Sutton the Lone Crazed Patsy Messenger, simply label-kill or ad hominem kill the messenger, Sutton, then ignore the message that World War Two has not ended if the fourth generation of Bush Warco is still on a roll.
Noam Chomsky calls fourth generation Bush Warco "1930's militarized state capitalism". "1930's" may be a euphemism for Mussolini, but Mussolini and Hitler and Thyssen and Krupp are dead, and "1930's" is also a synonym for Samhain and Prescott Bush. Prescott managed Harriman, Whitney, Ford, Rockefeller, the whole east coast establishment's money, and "Brown", the British partners in the anglophile establishement's, money in the nazi war machine. Prescott managed twenty companies in the Auscwhitz death and labor camp, across the street from IG Farben, which had merged with Rockefeller's Standard Oil. People are calling them "war corporatists". People are saying "corporate welfare". You may have read about "king's charters", and the king is not going to regulate his scam, so environmentalists need to read McChesney to realize it's a war not a battle. All across the FM radio dial last night, all I could find were two shows, a baseball game and Dr. Drew. Essentially that means there is only one channel, Bread and Circuses, thanks to "king's charters" to UNREGULATED, infallible king's monopolies in media and everything else. You can't even have a union anymore. Unions are uppity, dis-respectful, when it's the king's charter, after all. Greg Palast points out that wages have gone down in Mexico and the US, supply and demand, as formerly US jobs are now divided among a larger pool, US and Mexican workers. Wall St Journal will tell you the opposite on the front page, but they can only find a percent of wage increase for the jobs that remain, not the better paying jobs that don't exist anymore to ruin their neolib propaganda, thanks to NAFTA and globalization. President Dwight D. Eisenhower called them "the military industrial complex", and his message was killed by scapegoating an anonymous, lone crazed hippy somewhere with inventing Eisenhower's expression. Label-kill the anonymous hippie, or ad hominem a person using Eisenhower's phrase by pointing his long hair or beard, and ignore Eisenhower's message throughout the 1960's and 1970's, ignoring the military-industrial elephant under the carpet for the duration of the Vietnam War. Sam Bush, Prescott Bush, George Herbert Walker, and Bernard Baruch made two hundred million non-adjusted dollars off of both sides in WW2. Sam and George took board room seats, Prescott the executive position, as Bush Warco maneuvered Adolf Hitler in the 1920's toward a position as dictator for what became Noam Chomsky's "1930's militarized state capitalism", which Chomsky associates with "failed states", not harbingers of prosperity politically or economically. Greg Palast, as an economist, dissects the victims of militarized state capitalism. We can't Sean persuade us to turn a blind eye to four continuous generations Bush Warco, World War Two Extended, Choicepoint, Diebold, Armitage, Goss, 911, Saudi-Houston-Baker document corresponding to nazi dot inside neocon circle which is PNAC document. Greg Palast put Mike Ruppert Peak Oil pundit out of business. Palast also puts Sean McBride under by exposing the nazi dot Baker Saudi-financed empire plan corresponding to neocon patsy roundtable's PNAC. One of Sean's main themes is that we can trust the dialectical dot to save us by Kissinger realism, daddy Bush crew's moderation. Better read Palast, Armed Madhouse, Palast is not so flattering to fossil flatulence. And know that PNAC is not the only plan, that it's just the patsy scapegoat plan. Case in point, you've heard of PNAC, but you haven't heard of the Saudi-Baker plan, have you? Dot in a circle, Sean wants you to see only the Likudnik PNAC dot. Dialectic, dot in a circle, look for it every time. -Bob --- In cia-drugs@yahoogroups.com, "norgesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Re: [political-research] Re: chip berlet II > > > "He appears to be a hired gun for the powers that be." > > > > And you have never proved you are not. > > > "Sean McBride" is a false name you use to post disruptive posts on Internet forums. Your troll attacks people by name, becomes a major poster, challenging folks that dare to speak differently and then you posit binary discourses. > > > You always want to debate. As I posted from Wiki a debate is a rhetorical game used by demagogues, which you have never challenged. > > > Antony Sutton doesn't advance a "unified field theory for global politics or world history." If you had actually read his more than twenty books or had ever talked with the gentleman, you would know that. But because for your world-view to prevail you must denigrate Sutton. You do this by creating a strawman argument. Just like the one I am commented on right now. Your strawman argumenst are many and your other uses of subtle propaganda are also very telling. Why do you have to use all these lies and rhetorical tricks to make your points? Because you are a false meme "soldier" in the psychological warfare being waged against us hoi polloi by an elite that are in control of much and are grasping for more. > > > Another trick used in you small missive below is lumping Pat Robertson and Antony Sutton together. They are very different personages, their philosophy and "rewards" for their parts in life's drama. Pat Robertson is not a Christian. He is a spook, like Berlet. He lays down false memes, helps run one of the main mind-control ops, fundy xtians, and is part of the whole end times drama game. Robertson ties to intel in his many African operations are well known. His finances have had there share of interesting episodes. The physical area and the social dynamics where he exerts his influence is very important to the elites. Virgina Beach/Norfolk area is the home to much intelligence and navel assets and power. The revelations of Kay Griggs about Robertson are concurrent with the known patterns of elite conspiratorial activities. > > > Antony Sutton had his "rice bowl broken" in the the early seventies, when he uncovered and refused all entreaties to not report on the fact that the Soviet war materials being used in Viet Nam against US soldiers were made possible by secret transfers of American technology to the USSR. > > > McBride, over and over, has set up the strawman that Sutton, myself and others have some rigid theory that says Bones/Yale rules the world. That is not true. Yes, both Sutton and I have found that by studying Bones and the secret society system, that is unique to Yale we can learn a lot about the ruling hegemony. And that we say that this hegemony is being maintained by conspiratorial actions that uses a network that includes these secret societies, foundations, corporations, the endowments, the oil industry, the drug industry, the world's banks, intelligence services, etc to accomplish their goal of a global control. > > > Sutton wrote books about Wall Street, about war and revolution, about monetary policy, about the Federal Reserve, about the Tri-Lateral Commission about the non-energy crisis, and more. > > > So as to not set up a strawman, and maybe you could actually answer a question that you have never answered. McBride, you have claimed that the power behind the cabal that you have stated is bringing about a national crisis that you are so concerned about, that you spend your time creating dissension on silly email lists, is the Forbes 50 "Jewish" billionaires. Can you please enlighten us all the dynamics, the organizations used to foist the neo-cons upon us hoi polloi, that is independent and cohesive. I have asked several times for you to show me a cohesion between twenty or even ten of you Forbes billionaires. There are a myriad of cohesive conspiratorial conclaves and gatherings by the elite deviants that I ascribe a conspiracy too. > > > Yes, McBride, there is conspiracy. > > > And I want to expose and fight it. > > > The McBride trolls of the world just want to set up a controlled dialectic that divides us hoi polloi into unreconcilable camps. > > > MHO > Peace, > Om > K > > > On Aug 5, 2006, at 9:14 AM, Sean McBride wrote: > > > Just to repeat the obvious once more: I am not Berlet, I do not know Berlet, I have never communicated with Berlet, and I disagree with most of Berlet's writings. Also, I have never conspired with anyone against Millegan in his lists. I confess to expressing some disagreements with some of Millegan's conspiracy theories, however -- in general I don't buy any kind of unified field theory for global politics or world history, whether advanced by Antony Sutton, Pat Robertson or anyone else. > > Wrt Berlet: I took a look at some more of his writings recently. He is infuriating on the subject of 9/11 -- the weakness and dishonesty of his apologetics on this issue is manifest. But some of his other writings on the intellectual history of Christianity are quite interesting. He's a solid researcher and he writes well. But don't expect any major revelations from him about what is really going on in the world. He appears to be a hired gun for the powers that be. > > > > foxhallgeorgetwn foxhallgeorgetwn@ wrote: > > Mr. McBride, > looks like I just got booted off ctrl. apparently, or sticking up for you! as a whole, I > seem to generally agree with the gist of your presentations, one reason why I don't > read your posts; preaching to the choir, as the saying goes. Now that kris millegan > has seen fit to include me in his paranoid conspiracy theory about your internet use, > well, I am tempted to fight back with some anti-millegan posts elsewhere. I don't > care if your name is chip berlet, which I doubt it is, millegan cannot prove his points, > he is substituting insubstantial conjecture for facts. That is the sign of an immature > thinker. chip berlet? well, if he was a great thinker, then I would be familiar with > him, I am unfamiliar with him, and to me that means he has nothing to address to > my personal quest. if you have anything to fill me in on about millegan, please feel > free. I am an individual and my work is my own responsibility, I am not part of an > organized 'troll conspiracy' as millegan implies. > > fox > Complete archives at http://www.sitbot.net/ Please let us stay on topic and be civil. OM Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cia-drugs/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
