As to what are called charros of corrupt trade union bosses, and other
references to labor and unions, a great pre-requisite book would be
Solidarity Divided by Bill Fletcher, a history of the US labor movement
from a longterm high level insider.

Of many grassroots groups and their reaching out to others with common
ground, recognize two dynamics of indisputable legitimacy, and does
communitarianism recognize those two enfranchisements of real people, or
does it serve as counter-insurgency ploy of corporatist oligarchist
neolib imperialism? What then, does communitarianism live up to its
advertised role of superceding "socialisms"?

-Bob

http://www.internationalviewpoint.org/spip.php?article1073
International Viewpoint  Online magazine     :            IV379 - June
2006                  Latin America         New  Challenges to
Imperialism
  James D. Cockcroft 
<http://www.internationalviewpoint.org/spip.php?auteur58>



More than 25 years of neoliberalism in Latin America have undermined the
region's local industry, small farms, and employment opportunities.
The resulting gradual economic genocide has generated humiliating
poverty for three-fourths of Latin Americans, downward mobility for
shrinking intermediate classes, last-ditch fight-backs by dwindling
ranks of organized labor, and waves of internal and external migration.

It has also produced a new wave of social movements and leftward
electoral swings. There are, to be sure, strong counter-tendencies,
including attempts to destabilize governments; counter-revolutionary
plots and mobilizations; more repression and paramilitary terrorism; and
accelerating violence against women, gays, transsexuals, ethnic
minorities, nonconformist youth, journalists, and human rights groups.
  [320] Teachers march in Oaxaca
What is at stake in Latin America is nothing less than national
sovereignty and control of basic resources, including oil, gas, water,
low-wage labor, biodiversity, schools, hospitals, housing,
transportation, pensions, banks, and industries. The social movements
are protesting the privatization of nature, the commodification of life,
and the pillage imposed by neoliberal globalization, together with the
illegitimate, unpayable foreign debts passed down from the
dictatorships.

The presidential electoral shift from the "hard neoliberal"
right to the "soft neoliberal" center is exemplified in the
elections of Lula in Brazil, Néstor Kirchner in Argentina, Tabaré
Vázquez in Uruguay, Michelle Bachelet in Chile, even Nicanor Duarte
in Paraguay who initially backed MERCOSUR, South America's
alternative to FTAA that recently has incorporated Venezuela.

Similar electoral shifts are expected in upcoming elections in Peru,
Mexico, Ecuador, a few smaller nations of the Caribbean Basin, and
possibly even Colombia. Candidates routinely pledge not to implement
free-market fundamentalism and the FTAA, even though after being elected
these politicians give life support to the moribund neoliberal economic
model, and in some respects strengthen it.

This is in part due to the last few decades' weakening of the state
by privatization schemes, free trade pacts, and foreign debt burdens,
leaving governments vulnerable to what amounts to foreign capital
blackmail. That is a major reason why social movements target the IMF,
World Bank, FTAA, and WTO, in addition to US and European imperialisms
(Spain having passed the United States in Latin American investments).

The space for a more "humane" neoliberalism or bourgeois nationalism has
disappeared. That is why Bolivia's Evo Morales and Venezuela's
Hugo Chávez, while on many issues cooperating with the other recently
elected presidents, reject their "soft neoliberalism" approach,
advocating instead revolutionary changes based on state support for the
demands of the social movements.

Morales calls for a "communitarian socialism based on reciprocity
and solidarity," while Chávez emphasizes the need to
internationalize the revolution and create "a new socialism for the
21st century" because "another world is not possible within
capitalism."

A striking new element of today's social movements is their
increased resistance to co-optation, their growing numbers of
impoverished participants and their tactical inventiveness. Traditional
class structures and modes of struggle today are barely recognizable
because of neoliberalism's slashing of state social programs and use
of "flexible labor" leading to the collapse of the minimum wage,
immiseration of the masses, rising unemployment, and for even well
educated professionals "precariousness" of work and
"over-exploitation." The lines dividing social classes and
social movements have become blurred.

For the indigenous peoples of Latin America, neoliberalism exists as
"merely" the latest wrinkle in 500 years of genocidal subjection and
enduring resistance. In this sense, they are aware of certain historic
realities, such as the continuity of colonialism/imperialism; ecological
destruction; the creation and perpetuation of an unpayable debt as a
tool for dominating a people; and the routine use of kidnappings,
disappearances, torture, and violence against women.

Women have borne the brunt of the economic suffering under
neoliberalism, not to mention the stepped-up violence of everyday life.
Protests about the escalated abuse of women and the sex trade (now an
even larger economy than narco-trafficking) have become a focus of not
only feminist movements like the World March of Women, but of social
movements in general.

Examples of female leadership range from the Zapatista comandantas to
the Argentine piquiteras (unemployed people blocking busy intersections)
and Mothers and Grandmothers of the Plaza de Mayo. Especially noteworthy
are the women who led the nationwide outpouring to save President Hugo
Chávez's life during the two-day reign of Pedro Carmona
("Pedro El Breve") after the US-sponsored military coup of April
11, 2002, and the Bolivian workers, street vendors, and heads of
households of El Alto who have organized defense-and-struggle
committees.

The role of peasants and small farmers, in spite of increased
repression, has become prominent. In most cases, the multi-ethnic
"peasantry" constitutes a new inexpensive, flexible, and migrant
labor force. Whether Andean coca cultivators or landless workers like
Brazil's Movimento dos Trabalhadores Rurais Sem-Terra (MST, part of
the Via Campesina, a network of peasant movements in 87 countries), the
rural masses have mobilized, even in the cities.

A new labor militancy has also arisen against transnational corporations
and corrupted trade-union bosses (called charros in Mexico). Independent
trade-union confederations like Mexico's Authentic Labor Front (FAT)
or split-offs from old confederations like the National Union of Workers
(UNT) in Venezuela and Mexico are springing up everywhere. In Chile,
"Workers Collectives" have begun to fill the virtual void of
trade unions left by the still not completely dismantled state-terrorist
Pinochet dictatorship.

As importantly, workers' struggles are being internationalized,
linking up campaigns such as that of Coca Cola workers in Guatemala,
Colombia, and India, as well as the unionization fights in the
maquiladoras (low-wage assembly plants) of Mexico, Central America, and
the Caribbean. Latin American workers have occupied so many factories
abandoned by their owners and made them productive again that in late
2005, Venezuela hosted a continental congress for workers of recuperated
factories.

There is also a growing recognition among Latin American peoples of the
need to form alliances and to internationalize their struggles. Examples
of the new internationalism, besides those already mentioned, include
the Continental Campaign against the FTAA sponsored by the Continental
Social Alliance and the campaign for the demilitarization of Latin
America that Mexico's Zapatistas began in Chiapas in 2003 and which
currently links up with the international campaign to close the more
than 700 US military bases in 130 countries. The Zapatistas'
"Other Campaign," initiated in 2006, also has a very
internationalist perspective.

Socialism is of growing interest in Latin America. Public opinion polls
in Venezuela and Brazil show more than half of each nation's
population favoring socialism, a word rarely heard in countries like
Chile and Mexico; but there is a growing debate about the kinds of
socialisms that should be sought.

There already exists a process of initiating what might be called
"two, three, many socialisms," starting with the Cuban
Revolution of 1959. As the famed Peruvian Marxist José Carlos
Mariátegui (d. 1930) wrote, Latin Americans do not want a replica of
European socialism, but instead want one based on their own reality, in
Peru's case the indigenous peoples.

Thus, Cuba's socialism is distinctly Cuban, Venezuela's is
rooted in the ideas of Simón Bolívar, Bolivia's is based on
indigenous traditions, and Ecuador's indigenous leader Blanca
Chancoso suggests "a plurinational, pluricultural state that we can
build together." And the Zapatistas (who do not speak of socialism)
advocate a system where all power comes from below, as in their
autonomous "juntas of good government" in Chiapas.

The debates show Latin America's multiple socialist perspectives to
share four characteristics: (1) Human-values driven, seeking an end to
patriarchy, racism, sexism, class exploitation, and genocide, based on
values of love (as in the works of Ché and José Martí), respect
for others, and social justice; (2) Participatory, without
Stalinist-type authoritarianism, but with multiple-level planning,
worker-controlled enterprises, and "politics instead of
politicking" (in the words of Fidel Castro), rooted in using the
state and people's participation from below instead of
"party-ocracy" or "vanguardism"; (3) Internationalist,
planning both home markets and international ones, defending peoples
against neoliberalism and imperialist interventions, and building
veto-free inter-state organizations to promote peace and human rights;
and (4) Pro-sovereignty of nation-states in defense of the principles of
non-intervention, non-aggression, and self-determination, including new
states created to link up many peoples (as in Bolivia and Venezuela) and
ones aspiring to true "national independence" through
unification into a Latin American state or confederation (as in
Martí's concept of "Our America" and Bolivar's "Gran
Patria").

Critical to the future of humanity and the planet will be the speed with
which transitions away from neoliberal capitalism occur and the
frequency of breaks, or ruptures, with capitalism. Ultimately, there can
be no saving of humanity without a swiftly expanded practice of
internationalism, already given new life by recent developments in Latin
America and the alter-globalization movement. Internationalism is a
process of human solidarity and exchange of experiences, learning from
"the other." People in what Martí called "the belly of
the beast," that is, the United States, have a chance to make a
critical difference.

All will depend on how much unity and internationalism can be built
among the social movements and among different governments in the face
of imperialism's stepped-up pressures. Debates about Latin American
socialisms, even among the supporters of the Zapatista "Other
Campaign," are based on the principle of creating ecologically
responsible states of "people's power," where the people (or
in Zapatista language, those of below) are, in the words of
Venezuela's new Constitution, the "protagonists." All agree
on the overarching goal: to liberate humanity, celebrate life, honor
death, and save the planet.

This article will soon be published in LiP <http://www.lipmagazine.org/>
magazine.

  [-] James Cockcroft, Fellow at the International Institute for Research
and Education in Amsterdam, Netherlands, is the author of 35 books,
including Mexico's Hope (NY: Monthly Review Press, 1999) and Latin
America (Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/ International Thomson Publishing,
Second ed. 1998), both translated into Spanish and published in 2001 by
Mexico City's Siglo Veintiuno Editores.

Other recent articles:

Latin America <http://www.internationalviewpoint.org/spip.php?mot80>
  The Epic Struggle of Indigenous Andean-Amazonian Culture
<http://www.internationalviewpoint.org/spip.php?article1310>            
- September 2007              Strategies of the Left in Latin America
<http://www.internationalviewpoint.org/spip.php?article1301>            
- July 2007              Resistance and Revolution 
<http://www.internationalviewpoint.org/spip.php?article1072>            
- June 2006              Latin America - a Continent Turns Left
<http://www.internationalviewpoint.org/spip.php?article971>            
- February 2006              Notes on the situation in Latin America
<http://www.internationalviewpoint.org/spip.php?article967>            
- February 2006

Reply via email to