On Mon, 2008-06-23 at 08:30 -0700, Richard Guthrie wrote: > Andrew, > > I have re-visited your request to have more use cases added to the > documentation. We have decided to leave the text as is, but I wanted > to resend the kb article that discusses why a windows server might > respond with NETLOGON_SAM_LOGON_RESPONSE_NT40 which is kb article > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/298713. If there are no further > questions, I will consider this issue resolved.
I can't consider it resolved while the documentation includes un-filled references to implementation-defined behaviour. The definition of the implementation's behaviour is *exactly* what these docs need to represent. Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/ Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org Samba Developer, Red Hat Inc.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ cifs-protocol mailing list cifs-protocol@cifs.org https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-protocol
