cifs-protocol  

Messages by Thread

• [cifs-protocol] Incomplete information in [MS-PCCRC: 3.1, 3.2] Christopher R. Hertel
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Incomplete information in [MS-PCCRC: 3.1, 3.2] Josh Curry
• Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:112021212002899] encryption key for NetrLogonSamLogonEx Obaid Farooqi
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:112021212002899] encryption key for NetrLogonSamLogonEx Obaid Farooqi
• [cifs-protocol] ntproof field Matthieu Patou
• [cifs-protocol] encryption key for NetrLogonSamLogonEx Matthieu Patou
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] encryption key for NetrLogonSamLogonEx Sebastian Canevari
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] encryption key for NetrLogonSamLogonEx Edgar Olougouna
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] encryption key for NetrLogonSamLogonEx Andrew Bartlett
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] encryption key for NetrLogonSamLogonEx Matthieu Patou
• [cifs-protocol] Connection turn down problem in W2k8R2? Volker Lendecke
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Connection turn down problem in W2k8R2? Obaid Farooqi
• Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111101553031054] SystemLibraryDTC Bryan Burgin
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111101553031054] SystemLibraryDTC Bryan Burgin
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111101553031054] SystemLibraryDTC Andrew Bartlett
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111101553031054] SystemLibraryDTC Bryan Burgin
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111101553031054] SystemLibraryDTC Andrew Bartlett
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111101553031054] SystemLibraryDTC Bryan Burgin
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111101553031054] SystemLibraryDTC Bryan Burgin
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111101553031054] SystemLibraryDTC Andrew Bartlett
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111101553031054] SystemLibraryDTC Bryan Burgin
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111101553031054] SystemLibraryDTC Andrew Bartlett
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111101553031054] SystemLibraryDTC Jay Simmons
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111101553031054] SystemLibraryDTC Jay Simmons
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111101553031054] SystemLibraryDTC Bryan Burgin
• [cifs-protocol] [REG:111122854095339] Note regarding SMB_COM_NEGOTIATE Bryan Burgin
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111122854095339] Note regarding SMB_COM_NEGOTIATE Christopher R. Hertel
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111122854095339] Note regarding SMB_COM_NEGOTIATE Bryan Burgin
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111122854095339] Note regarding SMB_COM_NEGOTIATE Bryan Burgin
• [cifs-protocol] Note regarding SMB_COM_NEGOTIATE Christopher R. Hertel
• [cifs-protocol] [REG:111122055068137] Confirm kerberos key selection rules for PAC KDC signature Bryan Burgin
• [cifs-protocol] Confirm kerberos key selection rules for PAC KDC signature Andrew Bartlett
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Confirm kerberos key selection rules for PAC KDC signature Josh Curry
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Confirm kerberos key selection rules for PAC KDC signature Edgar Olougouna
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Confirm kerberos key selection rules for PAC KDC signature Andrew Bartlett
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Confirm kerberos key selection rules for PAC KDC signature Edgar Olougouna
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Confirm kerberos key selection rules for PAC KDC signature Andrew Bartlett
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Confirm kerberos key selection rules for PAC KDC signature Edgar Olougouna
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Confirm kerberos key selection rules for PAC KDC signature Andrew Bartlett
• [cifs-protocol] [REG:111121459051600] Puzzled: Heimdal upgrade breaks Win2k8 dcpromo Bryan Burgin
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111121459051600] Puzzled: Heimdal upgrade breaks Win2k8 dcpromo Bryan Burgin
• [cifs-protocol] [REG: 111121459051600] Puzzled: Heimdal upgrade breaks Win2k8 dcpromo Edgar Olougouna
• [cifs-protocol] Puzzled: Heimdal upgrade breaks Win2k8 dcpromo Andrew Bartlett
• Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111120724281237] SMB2 ProcessId header field for SYNC messages. Obaid Farooqi
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111120724281237] SMB2 ProcessId header field for SYNC messages. Christopher R. Hertel
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111120724281237] SMB2 ProcessId header field for SYNC messages. Obaid Farooqi
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111120724281237] SMB2 ProcessId header field for SYNC messages. Obaid Farooqi
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111120724281237] SMB2 ProcessId header field for SYNC messages. Christopher R. Hertel
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111120724281237] SMB2 ProcessId header field for SYNC messages. Obaid Farooqi
• Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111112257588419] RE: - Windows DC returning WERR_DS_DRA_NO_REPLICA when Samba DC wants to send replica Obaid Farooqi
• Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111112257588419] - Windows DC returning WERR_DS_DRA_NO_REPLICA when Samba DC wants to send replica Matthieu Patou
• [cifs-protocol] Maximum number of file handles allowed for a CIFS/SMB session Rahul Katariya
• [cifs-protocol] [REG:111120724281237] SMB2 ProcessId header field for SYNC messages. Bryan Burgin
• [cifs-protocol] SMB2 ProcessId header field for SYNC messages. Christopher R. Hertel
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] SMB2 ProcessId header field for SYNC messages. Bryan Burgin
• [cifs-protocol] Download performance on CIFS Josu Lazkano
• [cifs-protocol] [REG:111111804605994] RE: data checksum value in FRS Hongwei Sun
• Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG: 111111580301298 ] DNS partition creation Matthieu Patou
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG: 111111580301298 ] DNS partition creation Matthieu Patou
• Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111110168569640] RE: double send of command joined from a upstream windows Server Hongwei Sun
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111110168569640] RE: double send of command joined from a upstream windows Server Hongwei Sun
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111110168569640] RE: double send of command joined from a upstream windows Server Matthieu Patou
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111110168569640] RE: double send of command joined from a upstream windows Server Hongwei Sun
• Re: [cifs-protocol] data checksum value in FRS Sebastian Canevari
• [cifs-protocol] [REG: 111111580301298 ] DNS partition creation Tarun Chopra
• [cifs-protocol] [REG: 111111582582159] highest_usn and tmp_highest_usn in highwatermark < max usn sent in getcchanges Edgar Olougouna
• [cifs-protocol] highest_usn and tmp_highest_usn in highwatermark < max usn sent in getcchanges Matthieu Patou
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] highest_usn and tmp_highest_usn in highwatermark < max usn sent in getcchanges Sebastian Canevari
• [cifs-protocol] DNS partition creation Matthieu Patou
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] DNS partition creation Sebastian Canevari
• [cifs-protocol] AUTO: Dan Argent is out of the office (returning 24/10/2011) Dan Argent
• [cifs-protocol] [REG:111101553031054] RE: SystemLibraryDTC Hongwei Sun
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111101553031054] RE: SystemLibraryDTC Andrew Bartlett
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111101553031054] RE: SystemLibraryDTC Hongwei Sun
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111101553031054] RE: SystemLibraryDTC Hongwei Sun
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111101553031054] RE: SystemLibraryDTC Andrew Bartlett
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111101553031054] RE: SystemLibraryDTC Hongwei Sun
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111101553031054] RE: SystemLibraryDTC Andrew Bartlett
• [cifs-protocol] [REG: 111101553031054] SystemLibraryDTC Edgar Olougouna
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG: 111101553031054] SystemLibraryDTC Hongwei Sun
• [cifs-protocol] SystemLibraryDTC Andrew Bartlett
• [cifs-protocol] [REG: 111101256623456] SMB2: ioctl max size Edgar Olougouna
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG: 111101256623456] SMB2: ioctl max size Edgar Olougouna
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG: 111101256623456] SMB2: ioctl max size Edgar Olougouna
• [cifs-protocol] SMB2: ioctl max size Stefan (metze) Metzmacher
• [cifs-protocol] [REG:111092854890403] RE: double send of command joined from a upstream windows Server Hongwei Sun
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111092854890403] RE: double send of command joined from a upstream windows Server Hongwei Sun
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111092854890403] RE: double send of command joined from a upstream windows Server Hongwei Sun
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111092854890403] RE: double send of command joined from a upstream windows Server Matthieu Patou
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111092854890403] RE: double send of command joined from a upstream windows Server Hongwei Sun
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111092854890403] RE: double send of command joined from a upstream windows Server Matthieu Patou
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111092854890403] RE: double send of command joined from a upstream windows Server Hongwei Sun
• Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111091961780016] Re: - About stage_header data Obaid Farooqi
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111091961780016] Re: - About stage_header data Obaid Farooqi
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111091961780016] Re: - About stage_header data Obaid Farooqi
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111091961780016] Re: - About stage_header data Matthieu Patou
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111091961780016] Re: - About stage_header data Obaid Farooqi
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111091961780016] Re: - About stage_header data Obaid Farooqi
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111091961780016] Re: - About stage_header data Obaid Farooqi
• Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111100564603264] [MS-NBTE] and NetBIOS name case. Bryan Burgin
• [cifs-protocol] [REG:11100564603264] [MS-NBTE] and NetBIOS name case. Bryan Burgin
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:11100564603264] [MS-NBTE] and NetBIOS name case. Christopher R. Hertel
• [cifs-protocol] [MS-NBTE] and NetBIOS name case. Christopher R. Hertel
• [cifs-protocol] [REG:111100558993529] deleted object in Bryan Burgin
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111100558993529] deleted object in Matthieu Patou
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111100558993529] deleted object in Sebastian Canevari
• [cifs-protocol] [REG:111092051963496] RE: flag 0x80 in the flags attribute of a remote_co part Hongwei Sun
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111092051963496] RE: flag 0x80 in the flags attribute of a remote_co part Matthieu Patou
• Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111092948476937] FRSRPC: questions about schedule Obaid Farooqi
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111092948476937] FRSRPC: questions about schedule Obaid Farooqi
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111092948476937] FRSRPC: questions about schedule Matthieu Patou
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111092948476937] FRSRPC: questions about schedule Obaid Farooqi
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111092948476937] FRSRPC: questions about schedule Matthieu Patou
• [cifs-protocol] [REG:111092973873305] [Pfif] Maximum Simultaneous Request for CIFS behavior clarification Bryan Burgin
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111092973873305] [Pfif] Maximum Simultaneous Request for CIFS behavior clarification Bryan Burgin
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111092973873305] [Pfif] Maximum Simultaneous Request for CIFS behavior clarification Tarun Chopra
• Re: [cifs-protocol] [Pfif] Maximum Simultaneous Request for CIFS behavior clarification [REG:111092973873305] Tom Jebo
• [cifs-protocol] [Pfif] Maximum Simultaneous Request for CIFS behavior clarification Steve French
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [Pfif] Maximum Simultaneous Request for CIFS behavior clarification Christopher R. Hertel
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [Pfif] Maximum Simultaneous Request for CIFS behavior clarification Tom Jebo
• [cifs-protocol] [REG: 111092947767946] Question about MS DNS behavior regarding DNS packets containing multiple questions Edgar Olougouna
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG: 111092947767946] Question about MS DNS behavior regarding DNS packets containing multiple questions Edgar Olougouna
• [cifs-protocol] FRSRPC: questions about schedule Matthieu Patou
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] FRSRPC: questions about schedule Tom Jebo
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [Pfif] FRSRPC: questions about schedule Steve French
• [cifs-protocol] Question about MS DNS behavior regarding DNS packets containing multiple questions Kai Blin
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Question about MS DNS behavior regarding DNS packets containing multiple questions Tom Jebo
• [cifs-protocol] Question about MS DNS server dropping packets from client Kai Blin
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Question about MS DNS server dropping packets from client Tom Jebo
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Question about MS DNS server dropping packets from client Hongwei Sun
• Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111091961780016] - About stage_header data Obaid Farooqi
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111091961780016] - About stage_header data Obaid Farooqi
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111091961780016] - About stage_header data Matthieu Patou
• Re: [cifs-protocol] Two new MS-FRS1 issues from Matthieu Patou re "Locking" Matthieu Patou
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Two new MS-FRS1 issues from Matthieu Patou re "Locking" Edgar Olougouna
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Two new MS-FRS1 issues from Matthieu Patou re "Locking" Edgar Olougouna
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Two new MS-FRS1 issues from Matthieu Patou re "Locking" Matthieu Patou
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Two new MS-FRS1 issues from Matthieu Patou re "Locking" Edgar Olougouna
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Two new MS-FRS1 issues from Matthieu Patou re "Locking" Edgar Olougouna
• Re: [cifs-protocol] flag 0x80 in the flags attribute of a remote_co part Hongwei Sun
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] flag 0x80 in the flags attribute of a remote_co part Hongwei Sun
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] flag 0x80 in the flags attribute of a remote_co part Matthieu Patou
• [cifs-protocol] About stage_header data Matthieu Patou
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] About stage_header data Sebastian Canevari
• Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111091520687224] MS-FRS1 precision Obaid Farooqi
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111091520687224] MS-FRS1 precision Obaid Farooqi
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111091520687224] MS-FRS1 precision Matthieu Patou
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111091520687224] MS-FRS1 precision Obaid Farooqi
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111091520687224] MS-FRS1 precision Matthieu Patou
• [cifs-protocol] [REG: 111091521929950 ]RE: about multi packet file transfer in FRSRPC Obaid Farooqi
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG: 111091521929950 ]RE: about multi packet file transfer in FRSRPC Edgar Olougouna
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG: 111091521929950 ]RE: about multi packet file transfer in FRSRPC Edgar Olougouna
• [cifs-protocol] [REG: 111091520687224 ] RE: MS-FRS1 precision Obaid Farooqi
• [cifs-protocol] about multi packet file transfer in FRSRPC Matthieu Patou
• [cifs-protocol] MS-FRS1 precision Matthieu Patou
• [cifs-protocol] [REG:111082958393266] RE: Precision related to FRS documentation Hongwei Sun
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111082958393266] RE: Precision related to FRS documentation Matthieu Patou
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111082958393266] RE: Precision related to FRS documentation Hongwei Sun
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111082958393266] RE: Precision related to FRS documentation Matthieu Patou
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111082958393266] RE: Precision related to FRS documentation Hongwei Sun
• [cifs-protocol] [REG: 111090284142510] Precisions for FRSRPC Edgar Olougouna
• [cifs-protocol] Precisions for FRSRPC Matthieu Patou
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Precisions for FRSRPC Josh Curry
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Precisions for FRSRPC Edgar Olougouna
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Precisions for FRSRPC Edgar Olougouna
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Precisions for FRSRPC Edgar Olougouna
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Precisions for FRSRPC Matthieu Patou
• [cifs-protocol] [REG: 111083054067588] RE: Handling of passwords in LSA CreateTrustedDomainInfoEx2 Hongwei Sun
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG: 111083054067588] RE: Handling of passwords in LSA CreateTrustedDomainInfoEx2 Andrew Bartlett
• Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111083100373286] FRS clarification about VVJOIN in FRS Obaid Farooqi
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111083100373286] FRS clarification about VVJOIN in FRS Obaid Farooqi
• [cifs-protocol] Errors when doing a DsAddEntry Andrew Bartlett
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Errors when doing a DsAddEntry Josh Curry
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Errors when doing a DsAddEntry Hongwei Sun
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Errors when doing a DsAddEntry Andrew Bartlett
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Errors when doing a DsAddEntry Hongwei Sun
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Errors when doing a DsAddEntry tridge
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Errors when doing a DsAddEntry Hongwei Sun
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Errors when doing a DsAddEntry Hongwei Sun
• [cifs-protocol] FRS clarification about VVJOIN in FRS Matthieu Patou
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] FRS clarification about VVJOIN in FRS Josh Curry
• [cifs-protocol] [REG:111082117135230] RE: Initial replication of sysvol through FRS Hongwei Sun
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111082117135230] RE: Initial replication of sysvol through FRS Matthieu Patou
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111082117135230] RE: Initial replication of sysvol through FRS Hongwei Sun
• [cifs-protocol] [REG:111082778570440] RE: precision about Parent GUID for FrsRpcStartPromotionParent Hongwei Sun
• [cifs-protocol] SMB2 Request Response Ordering Guarantees. Ira Cooper
• [cifs-protocol] Handling of passwords in LSA CreateTrustedDomainInfoEx2 Andrew Bartlett
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Handling of passwords in LSA CreateTrustedDomainInfoEx2 Josh Curry
• [cifs-protocol] Precision related to FRS documentation Matthieu Patou
• [cifs-protocol] precision about Parent GUID for FrsRpcStartPromotionParent Matthieu Patou
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] precision about Parent GUID for FrsRpcStartPromotionParent Hongwei Sun
• [cifs-protocol] [REG:111082453208213] RE: typo in ms-frs1.pdf ? Hongwei Sun
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111082453208213] RE: typo in ms-frs1.pdf ? Matthieu Patou
• Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111082467734507] Incoherent values in MS-FRS1.pdf in comparison to traces Obaid Farooqi
• [cifs-protocol] Incoherent values in MS-FRS1.pdf in comparison to traces Matthieu Patou
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Incoherent values in MS-FRS1.pdf in comparison to traces Hongwei Sun
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Incoherent values in MS-FRS1.pdf in comparison to traces Matthieu Patou
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Incoherent values in MS-FRS1.pdf in comparison to traces Obaid Farooqi
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Incoherent values in MS-FRS1.pdf in comparison to traces Matthieu Patou
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Incoherent values in MS-FRS1.pdf in comparison to traces Obaid Farooqi

• Earlier messages
• Later messages