On Wed, 2008-08-13 at 08:51 -0700, Richard Guthrie wrote: > Andrew, > > As per your last mail, we agree this looks like a good scenario to > target for the upcoming IO lab. As we have discussed, in order to not > waste time on debugging setup while you are in the lab, we would need > to work together prior to establish the correct repro environment. > Establishment of this repro would require your expertise to ensure the > environment accurately reproduces this issue.
Well, the NTLMv2 header signing is simply shown any time NTLMv2 is used for sign or seal on DCE/RPC. It is actually documented (if obliquely) in the NTLM spec. > Let us know if this sounds like an acceptable action plan and we can > work out the details on our next call together. That sounds fine. Should I just start a new VM on the isamba server, or is there one I should use, or? Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/ Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org Samba Developer, Red Hat Inc. http://redhat.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ cifs-protocol mailing list cifs-protocol@cifs.org https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-protocol
