On Tue, 2008-08-26 at 14:21 -0700, Richard Guthrie wrote: > Andrew, > > I will be working with you to resolve your issue. I had a quick > question to help with our research: > > If you have a secret object with old/new secret values set. They also > both have a timestamp indicating when the values were last > updated/set. You call LsarSetSecret passing in null for new secret > value and some value for old secret value. You observe that the old > secret value timestamp = ?, You observe that the new secret value > timestamp = ? (Please let me know what these values are in the test > you reference).
The old secret timestamp and the new secret timestamp is 'current server time' (or at least the same, my tests don't actually verify the clock). http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=blob;f=source/torture/rpc/lsa.c;h=ec74426ac6487be632441ca925342eac2466914b;hb=0c4227e45d6b8e31a0219358042318e9d2a0b36d#l1276 Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/ Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org Samba Developer, Red Hat Inc.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ cifs-protocol mailing list cifs-protocol@cifs.org https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-protocol
