cifs-protocol  

Messages by Thread

• Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:113102210883291] - [MS-SMB2] 3.3.5.22.1 NT_STATUS_REQUEST_NOT_ACCEPTED? Edgar Olougouna
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:113102210883291] - [MS-SMB2] 3.3.5.22.1 NT_STATUS_REQUEST_NOT_ACCEPTED? Edgar Olougouna
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:113102210883291] - [MS-SMB2] 3.3.5.22.1 NT_STATUS_REQUEST_NOT_ACCEPTED? Volker Lendecke
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:113102210883291] - [MS-SMB2] 3.3.5.22.1 NT_STATUS_REQUEST_NOT_ACCEPTED? Edgar Olougouna
• [cifs-protocol] 113102410891258 explanation on note MS-NRPC.pdf Sreekanth Nadendla
• [cifs-protocol] [REG:113103010905266] Behaviour of UF_LOCKOUT compared with UF_PASSWORD_EXPIRED Edgar Olougouna
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:113103010905266] Behaviour of UF_LOCKOUT compared with UF_PASSWORD_EXPIRED Edgar Olougouna
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:113103010905266] Behaviour of UF_LOCKOUT compared with UF_PASSWORD_EXPIRED Andrew Bartlett
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:113103010905266] Behaviour of UF_LOCKOUT compared with UF_PASSWORD_EXPIRED Edgar Olougouna
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:113103010905266] Behaviour of UF_LOCKOUT compared with UF_PASSWORD_EXPIRED Edgar Olougouna
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:113103010905266] Behaviour of UF_LOCKOUT compared with UF_PASSWORD_EXPIRED Andrew Bartlett
• [cifs-protocol] Behaviour of UF_LOCKOUT compared with UF_PASSWORD_EXPIRED Andrew Bartlett
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Behaviour of UF_LOCKOUT compared with UF_PASSWORD_EXPIRED Mark Miller (MOD)
• [cifs-protocol] explanation on note MS-NRPC.pdf Matthieu Patou
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] explanation on note MS-NRPC.pdf Mark Miller (MOD)
• Re: [cifs-protocol] [MS-SMB2] 3.3.5.22.1 NT_STATUS_REQUEST_NOT_ACCEPTED? [REG:113102210883291] Josh Curry
• [cifs-protocol] [MS-SMB2] 3.3.5.22.1 NT_STATUS_REQUEST_NOT_ACCEPTED? Volker Lendecke
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [MS-SMB2] 3.3.5.22.1 NT_STATUS_REQUEST_NOT_ACCEPTED? Sebastian Canevari
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [MS-SMB2] 3.3.5.22.1 NT_STATUS_REQUEST_NOT_ACCEPTED? Sebastian Canevari
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [MS-SMB2] 3.3.5.22.1 NT_STATUS_REQUEST_NOT_ACCEPTED? Volker Lendecke
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [MS-SMB2] 3.3.5.22.1 NT_STATUS_REQUEST_NOT_ACCEPTED? Sebastian Canevari
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [MS-SMB2] 3.3.5.22.1 NT_STATUS_REQUEST_NOT_ACCEPTED? Sebastian Canevari
• [cifs-protocol] [REG:113102010876826] MS-NLMP and V1 Signatuers without Extended Session Security Edgar Olougouna
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:113102010876826] MS-NLMP and V1 Signatuers without Extended Session Security Obaid Farooqi
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:113102010876826] MS-NLMP and V1 Signatuers without Extended Session Security simo
• [cifs-protocol] MS-NLMP and V1 Signatuers without Extended Session Security simo
• [cifs-protocol] [REG:113101710870929] Where is account lockout and password expiry described in the docs? Edgar Olougouna
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:113101710870929] Where is account lockout and password expiry described in the docs? Edgar Olougouna
• [cifs-protocol] Where is account lockout and password expiry described in the docs? Andrew Bartlett
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Where is account lockout and password expiry described in the docs? Sebastian Canevari
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Where is account lockout and password expiry described in the docs? Andrew Bartlett
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Where is account lockout and password expiry described in the docs? Sebastian Canevari
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Where is account lockout and password expiry described in the docs? Sebastian Canevari
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Where is account lockout and password expiry described in the docs? Andrew Bartlett
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Where is account lockout and password expiry described in the docs? Andrew Bartlett
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Where is account lockout and password expiry described in the docs? Andrew Bartlett
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Where is account lockout and password expiry described in the docs? Andrew Bartlett
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Where is account lockout and password expiry described in the docs? Sebastian Canevari
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Where is account lockout and password expiry described in the docs? Sebastian Canevari
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Where is account lockout and password expiry described in the docs? Andrew Bartlett
• [cifs-protocol] 113100910848314 session logoff request / response clarification Sreekanth Nadendla
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] 113100910848314 session logoff request / response clarification Shirish Pargaonkar
• [cifs-protocol] [REG:113100910848319] [MS-SMB2]Q 2 of 3: Does the client behaviour stated in section 3.2.5.4 (Receiving an SMB2 LOGOFF Response) apply in case of an error as well? Bryan Burgin
  • [cifs-protocol] [REG:113100910848319] [MS-SMB2]Q 2 of 3: Does the client behaviour stated in section 3.2.5.4 (Receiving an SMB2 LOGOFF Response) apply in case of an error as well? Sreekanth Nadendla
• [cifs-protocol] [REG:113100910848314]] [MS-SMB2] Q 1 of 3: Types of error a server can return in response to a session logoff request from a client (section 2.2.8). Bryan Burgin
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:113100910848314]] [MS-SMB2] Q 1 of 3: Types of error a server can return in response to a session logoff request from a client (section 2.2.8). Sreekanth Nadendla
• [cifs-protocol] [REG:113100910848322] [MS-SMB2] Q 3 of 3: behaviour if the signature verification fails in section 3.2.5.1.3 Bryan Burgin
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:113100910848322] [MS-SMB2] Q 3 of 3: behaviour if the signature verification fails in section 3.2.5.1.3 Sreekanth Nadendla
• [cifs-protocol] session logoff request / response clarification Shirish Pargaonkar
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] session logoff request / response clarification Bryan Burgin
• [cifs-protocol] session logoff request / response Shirish Pargaonkar
• [cifs-protocol] [REG113100710843173]: Question about LDAP delete operation on Administrator and other built-in accounts Bryan Burgin
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG113100710843173]: Question about LDAP delete operation on Administrator and other built-in accounts Edgar Olougouna
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG113100710843173]: Question about LDAP delete operation on Administrator and other built-in accounts Edgar Olougouna
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG113100710843173]: Question about LDAP delete operation on Administrator and other built-in accounts Nadezhda Ivanova
• [cifs-protocol] Question about LDAP delete operation on Administrator and other built-in accounts Nadezhda Ivanova
• [cifs-protocol] Fwd: Missing fsctl control code Steve French
• [cifs-protocol] CIFS connection is getting reset Rahul Katariya
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] CIFS connection is getting reset Richard Sharpe
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] CIFS connection is getting reset Rahul Katariya
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] CIFS connection is getting reset Richard Sharpe
• [cifs-protocol] [REG:113041210363439] RE: [MS-CIFS] Windows Note 246. Obaid Farooqi
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:113041210363439] RE: [MS-CIFS] Windows Note 246. Christopher R. Hertel
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:113041210363439] RE: [MS-CIFS] Windows Note 246. Sebastian Canevari
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:113041210363439] RE: [MS-CIFS] Windows Note 246. Sebastian Canevari
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:113041210363439] RE: [MS-CIFS] Windows Note 246. Christopher R. Hertel
• [cifs-protocol] [MS-CIFS] Windows Note 246. Christopher R. Hertel
• [cifs-protocol] OpLock break on a compound request causes W2K08 to issue RST in one case but not another Richard Sharpe
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] OpLock break on a compound request causes W2K08 to issue RST in one case but not another Richard Sharpe
• [cifs-protocol] SMB2 Session/Signing Key with NTLMv2 + SPNEGO Brad Fewster
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] SMB2 Session/Signing Key with NTLMv2 + SPNEGO Brad Fewster
• Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:113011010129494] FSCTL_SRV_COPYCHUNK overlapping ranges Edgar Olougouna
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:113011010129494] FSCTL_SRV_COPYCHUNK overlapping ranges Edgar Olougouna
• [cifs-protocol] [REG:113011010129260] NT_TRANSACT_QUERY_QUOTA: Help needed Bryan Burgin
  • [cifs-protocol] [REG:113011010129260] NT_TRANSACT_QUERY_QUOTA: Help needed Bryan Burgin
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:113011010129260] NT_TRANSACT_QUERY_QUOTA: Help needed Edgar Olougouna
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:113011010129260] NT_TRANSACT_QUERY_QUOTA: Help needed Edgar Olougouna
• [cifs-protocol] AUTO: Dan Argent is out of the office for christmas (returning 02/01/2013) Dan Argent
• Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:112120610062311] Questions about "Unsecure Join" (old-style join domain) Obaid Farooqi
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:112120610062311] Questions about "Unsecure Join" (old-style join domain) Edgar Olougouna
• Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:112120410054506] FSCTL_SRV_COPYCHUNK locking discrepancies between Windows versions Obaid Farooqi
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:112120410054506] FSCTL_SRV_COPYCHUNK locking discrepancies between Windows versions Edgar Olougouna
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:112120410054506] FSCTL_SRV_COPYCHUNK locking discrepancies between Windows versions David Disseldorp
• [cifs-protocol] FSCTL_SRV_COPYCHUNK locking discrepancies between Windows versions David Disseldorp
• Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:112120310051084] FSCTL_SRV_COPYCHUNK overlapping ranges Obaid Farooqi
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:112120310051084] FSCTL_SRV_COPYCHUNK overlapping ranges Edgar Olougouna
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:112120310051084] FSCTL_SRV_COPYCHUNK overlapping ranges David Disseldorp
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:112120310051084] FSCTL_SRV_COPYCHUNK overlapping ranges Edgar Olougouna
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:112120310051084] FSCTL_SRV_COPYCHUNK overlapping ranges David Disseldorp
• [cifs-protocol] FSCTL_SRV_COPYCHUNK overlapping ranges David Disseldorp
• [cifs-protocol] 回复： is it possible to rename a dfs referral target from client? James Pan
• [cifs-protocol] is it possible to rename a dfs referral target? James Pan
• [cifs-protocol] Method to calculate 'mechListMIC' for spnego gss-api(ntlmssp_auth) accept-completed(0) State shishir
• [cifs-protocol] [REG:112110862761681] FSCTL_SRV_COPYCHUNK error response Bryan Burgin
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:112110862761681] FSCTL_SRV_COPYCHUNK error response Obaid Farooqi
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:112110862761681] FSCTL_SRV_COPYCHUNK error response David Disseldorp
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:112110862761681] FSCTL_SRV_COPYCHUNK error response Obaid Farooqi
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:112110862761681] FSCTL_SRV_COPYCHUNK error response Obaid Farooqi
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:112110862761681] FSCTL_SRV_COPYCHUNK error response Obaid Farooqi
• [cifs-protocol] FSCTL_SRV_COPYCHUNK error response David Disseldorp
• [cifs-protocol] [RE: 112101850229631] Scope of a File.LeaseKey on the client Tarun Chopra
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] 112101850229631] Scope of a File.LeaseKey on the client Tarun Chopra
• [cifs-protocol] [REG:112053067163367] [MS-SMB2] handle based permission checks Bryan Burgin
• Re: [cifs-protocol] GetRevealSecretsPolicyForUser Matthieu Patou
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] GetRevealSecretsPolicyForUser Edgar Olougouna
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] GetRevealSecretsPolicyForUser Tarun Chopra
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] GetRevealSecretsPolicyForUser Matthieu Patou
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] GetRevealSecretsPolicyForUser Tarun Chopra
• [cifs-protocol] [RE:112101850229631] Scope of a File.LeaseKey on the client Tarun Chopra
• [cifs-protocol] Scope of a File.LeaseKey on the client Stefan (metze) Metzmacher
• Re: [cifs-protocol] 112092556662141] FRS questions Matthieu Patou
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] 112092556662141] FRS questions Tarun Chopra
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] 112092556662141] FRS questions Matthieu Patou
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] 112092556662141] FRS questions Tarun Chopra
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] 112092556662141] FRS questions Matthieu Patou
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] 112092556662141] FRS questions Tarun Chopra
• Re: [cifs-protocol] Error message while trying to demote Windows 2008r2 Edgar Olougouna
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] Error message while trying to demote Windows 2008r2 Edgar Olougouna
• [cifs-protocol] nTDSDSA Object and serverreference attribute Matthieu Patou
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] nTDSDSA Object and serverreference attribute Sebastian Canevari
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] nTDSDSA Object and serverreference attribute Matthieu Patou
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] nTDSDSA Object and serverreference attribute Sebastian Canevari
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] nTDSDSA Object and serverreference attribute Sebastian Canevari
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] nTDSDSA Object and serverreference attribute Matthieu Patou
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] nTDSDSA Object and serverreference attribute Sebastian Canevari
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] nTDSDSA Object and serverreference attribute Matthieu Patou
• [cifs-protocol] [REG: 112091915263549] clarification for application instance ID Edgar Olougouna
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG: 112091915263549] clarification for application instance ID Stefan (metze) Metzmacher
• [cifs-protocol] [REG: 112082770583609] SMB3 encryption and ECHO command Edgar Olougouna
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG: 112082770583609] SMB3 encryption and ECHO command Edgar Olougouna
• [cifs-protocol] [REG: 112082371227089] SMB3 encryption and Oplock/Lease break notifications Edgar Olougouna
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG: 112082371227089] SMB3 encryption and Oplock/Lease break notifications Edgar Olougouna
• [cifs-protocol] [REG: 112082370902333] SMB3 encryption of SESSION_SETUP (for reauth/or channel binding) and TREE_CONNECT Edgar Olougouna
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG: 112082370902333] SMB3 encryption of SESSION_SETUP (for reauth/or channel binding) and TREE_CONNECT Edgar Olougouna
• Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:112080864018345] SMB3 encryption over multiple requests Bryan Burgin
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:112080864018345] SMB3 encryption over multiple requests Edgar Olougouna
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:112080864018345] SMB3 encryption over multiple requests Stefan (metze) Metzmacher
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:112080864018345] SMB3 encryption over multiple requests Edgar Olougouna
• [cifs-protocol] [REG: 112080853508014] SMB3 channel sequence questions. When is Open.OutstandingPreRequestCount supposed to be decremented or reset Edgar Olougouna
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG: 112080853508014] SMB3 channel sequence questions. When is Open.OutstandingPreRequestCount supposed to be decremented or reset Edgar Olougouna
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG: 112080853508014] SMB3 channel sequence questions. When is Open.OutstandingPreRequestCount supposed to be decremented or reset Stefan (metze) Metzmacher
• [cifs-protocol] [REG:112080864018345] SMB3 encryption over multiple requests Bryan Burgin
• [cifs-protocol] 112080864018345 SMB3 encryption over multiple requests Sreekanth Nadendla
• [cifs-protocol] SMB3 encryption over multiple requests Stefan (metze) Metzmacher
• [cifs-protocol] 112080853508014 SMB3 channel sequence Sreekanth Nadendla
• [cifs-protocol] SMB3 channel sequence Stefan (metze) Metzmacher
• [cifs-protocol] AUTO: Dan Argent is out of the office (returning 29/06/2012) Dan Argent
• Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:112062456011515] msDS-HasInstantiatedNCs Obaid Farooqi
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:112062456011515] msDS-HasInstantiatedNCs Obaid Farooqi
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:112062456011515] msDS-HasInstantiatedNCs Obaid Farooqi
• [cifs-protocol] msDS-HasInstantiatedNCs Andrew Bartlett
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] msDS-HasInstantiatedNCs Tom Jebo
• Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:112051046226036] Windows 2008 R2 doesn’t return expiry on SMB2 expired sessions Obaid Farooqi
• [cifs-protocol] 112053067163367 handle based permission checks in SMB1? Sreekanth Nadendla
• [cifs-protocol] [REG: 112053052848843] Errors in [MS-CIFS] relating to Process Exit. Edgar Olougouna
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG: 112053052848843] Errors in [MS-CIFS] relating to Process Exit. Edgar Olougouna
• [cifs-protocol] Errors in [MS-CIFS] relating to Process Exit. Christopher R. Hertel
• [cifs-protocol] [REG: 112050861043432] When will clients/applications do a smb2 session reauth Edgar Olougouna
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG: 112050861043432] When will clients/applications do a smb2 session reauth Edgar Olougouna
• [cifs-protocol] 112050346749387 handle based permission checks in SMB1? Sreekanth Nadendla
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] 112050346749387 handle based permission checks in SMB1? Volker Lendecke
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] 112050346749387 handle based permission checks in SMB1? Sreekanth Nadendla
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] 112050346749387 handle based permission checks in SMB1? Volker Lendecke
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] 112050346749387 handle based permission checks in SMB1? Sreekanth Nadendla
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] 112050346749387 handle based permission checks in SMB1? Volker Lendecke
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] 112050346749387 handle based permission checks in SMB1? Sreekanth Nadendla
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] 112050346749387 handle based permission checks in SMB1? Volker Lendecke
• [cifs-protocol] handle based permission checks in SMB1? Volker Lendecke
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] handle based permission checks in SMB1? Mark Miller (MOD)
• Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:112042860618701] SMB1 -- proper client behavior when it does not hold an oplock Obaid Farooqi
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:112042860618701] SMB1 -- proper client behavior when it does not hold an oplock Obaid Farooqi
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:112042860618701] SMB1 -- proper client behavior when it does not hold an oplock Obaid Farooqi
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:112042860618701] SMB1 -- proper client behavior when it does not hold an oplock Jeff Layton
• [cifs-protocol] SMB1 -- proper client behavior when it does not hold an oplock Jeff Layton
  • [cifs-protocol] SMB1 -- proper client behavior when it does not hold an oplock Jeff Layton
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] SMB1 -- proper client behavior when it does not hold an oplock Sreekanth Nadendla
• Re: [cifs-protocol] [112042751520312] When will clients/applications do a smb2 session reauth Tarun Chopra
• [cifs-protocol] SMB2_CREATE_DURABLE_HANDLE_RECONNECT together with SMB2_CREATE_DURABLE_HANDLE_REQUEST Volker Lendecke
• [cifs-protocol] android cifsmanager requires group read permissions on samba server illum
  • [cifs-protocol] cifs manager illum
• [cifs-protocol] When will clients/applications do a smb2 session reauth Stefan (metze) Metzmacher
  • [cifs-protocol] When will clients/applications do a smb2 session reauth Stefan (metze) Metzmacher
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] When will clients/applications do a smb2 session reauth Sreekanth Nadendla
• Re: [cifs-protocol] attributes for schema object stored even when not specified in the ADD request Matthieu Patou
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] attributes for schema object stored even when not specified in the ADD request Sebastian Canevari
• [cifs-protocol] [REG:112032876132836] [MS-CIFS] Trans2FindFirst/FindNext Bryan Burgin
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:112032876132836] [MS-CIFS] Trans2FindFirst/FindNext Bryan Burgin
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:112032876132836] [MS-CIFS] Trans2FindFirst/FindNext Gordon Ross
• [cifs-protocol] [MS-CIFS] Trans2FindFirst/FindNext Gordon Ross
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [MS-CIFS] Trans2FindFirst/FindNext Sreekanth Nadendla
• Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:112030256125953] [MS-CIFS] PendingRequestTable issues. Bryan Burgin
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:112030256125953] [MS-CIFS] PendingRequestTable issues. Christopher R. Hertel
• [cifs-protocol] [REG:112030256125953] [MS-CIFS] PendingRequestTable issues. Bryan Burgin
• [cifs-protocol] [REG:112030174895568] clarification of MaxMpx value in MS-CIFS Bryan Burgin
• [cifs-protocol] [MS-CIFS] PendingRequestTable issues. Christopher R. Hertel
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [MS-CIFS] PendingRequestTable issues. Christopher R. Hertel
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] [MS-CIFS] PendingRequestTable issues. Josh Curry
• [cifs-protocol] clarification of MaxMpx value in MS-CIFS Jeff Layton
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] clarification of MaxMpx value in MS-CIFS Christopher R. Hertel
  • Re: [cifs-protocol] clarification of MaxMpx value in MS-CIFS Josh Curry

• Earlier messages