Thanks Andrew - especially for the corrections. Just to clarify, the document was never meant to be standalone; it is basically a set of notes I took during running down parameter storage. I do have more work to do before submitting the contained information as a change proposal for [MS-NRPC].
Of course, I do have more work to do before that, and I will keep you advised as I progress. Regards, Bill Wesse MCSE, MCTS / Escalation Engineer, US-CSS DSC PROTOCOL TEAM 8055 Microsoft Way Charlotte, NC 28273 TEL: +1(980) 776-8200 CELL: +1(704) 661-5438 FAX: +1(704) 665-9606 -----Original Message----- From: Andrew Bartlett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 17, 2008 1:12 AM To: Bill Wesse Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: Status: SRX080811600226 ([MS-NRPC] 2.2.1.3.12 Trust Account Details) superceded by SRX081013600536: [MS-NRPC] operation backing store linkages On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 06:40 -0700, Bill Wesse wrote: > Good morning Andrew. For your review, I have attached a working > document that details usage and Active Directory storage of several > select parameters used by [MS-NRPC] operations. > > > > The parameter notes in the document are not complete, and several > require additional research. Additionally, the document is organized > around operation parameters by name, not by operation. This is for the > purpose of brevity. I though it would be unproductive to insert > comments into sections of the original [MS-NRPC] document as examples > - which is what this doc is, example text. > > > > I would deeply appreciate your feedback concerning the quality of, and > whether or not this is the sort of information you are looking for > concerning the backing store information for the [MS-NRPC] operations > parameters. This is looking good, and seems quite a reasonable way to approach the problem. A few errors (just because I'm picky :-): 1.1 You give a lot of detail about accountName, except the actual attribute. 1.3 DomainName is not stored in the DC attribute - this is just the first component of the domain name. The example objects are not the most useful thing - if they are just un-annotated LDIF pastes. (I can usually find them by a simple search on my test DC, but probably do help the hypothetical target of a independent developer not performing network analysis). I do look forward to the completed document. Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/ Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org Samba Developer, Red Hat Inc. _______________________________________________ cifs-protocol mailing list cifs-protocol@cifs.org https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-protocol
