Hi Obaid, Since I was the originator for this request, If you have looked but not found any indication that there are any additional sid types than those listed I assume that SidTypeComputer = 9 (or something similar) must be a mistake in the way that these things were discovered previously in samba or wireshark.
You can close this issue as far as I am concerned. On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 7:22 AM, Obaid Farooqi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Andrew: > I tried to dig this up but the scope of your question is currently just too > broad. It would help greatly if you can give a little more information about > the scenario in which you saw this enum. Is there any additional information > that you or another member of Samba can recall that will help reduce the > breadth of the scope? Even a timeframe that the scenario was experienced may > prove to be useful. > > Thanks > Obaid Farooqi > > -----Original Message----- > From: Andrew Bartlett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2008 9:48 PM > To: Obaid Farooqi > Cc: 'ronnie sahlberg'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: Re: [cifs-protocol] RE: MS-SAMR missing SID name use type ? > > On Thu, 2008-10-23 at 17:22 -0700, Obaid Farooqi wrote: >> Good Afternoon Ronnie: >> I am still waiting for your response. We need this info to move forward on >> this case. > >> >> I believe there might be one additional value for this enum to >> describe a sid for a machine/computer : >> >> SidTypeComputer = 9 (or something similar) >> >> >> This assumption is based on Wireshark and Samba4 code. > > Because of the long history of Samba - without suitable documentation for the > most part, sometimes myths and legends build up. That said, I'm unable to > produce this value on the wire for LSA lookup names. > > What we are asking is for is some research and clarification (if possible). > We can't ask you how we got this in the first place, but we were hoping you > might be able to do some digging, to check the IDL and see if this value ever > occours in this enum in windows (ie, is this a cut-down enum), or if there is > another similar (but not identical) enum that we might have got confused with. > > Thanks, > > -- > Andrew Bartlett > http://samba.org/~abartlet/ > Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org > Samba Developer, Red Hat Inc. > _______________________________________________ cifs-protocol mailing list cifs-protocol@cifs.org https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-protocol
