Good day once again Mr. French! I have verified that our [MS-SMB] working document has already incorporated the necessary deletion of the DialectCount field (2.2.4). The changes will be available in a future document refresh; notifications concerning protocol documentation updates to the Open Specifications are announced via our Protocols Perspective e-Newsletter.
I also checked Network Monitor 3.3 smb2.npl, which has the 'struct SMB2ResponseNegotiate.DialectCount' field defined, and have filed a bug against that. Please read on for further information about this! Thank you very much for bringing this to our attention. Please let me know if this answers your question satisfactorily; if so, I will consider your question resolved. If you haven't already done so, you can subscribe to the newsletter at the below link: Receive the Protocols Perspective e-Newsletter http://www.microsoft.com/protocols/optin.aspx Each month you'll receive helpful information about: Protocol Documentation Updates Patent License Program Other Licensing Programs Community Events Helpful Tips Licensee Case Studies ============================================================================== Network Monitor 3.3 can be obtained at: http://connect.microsoft.com/ %SystemDrive%\ProgramData\Microsoft\Network Monitor 3\NPL\Microsoft Parsers\Common\smb2.npl smb2.npl Line 180: Modify: struct SMB2ResponseNegotiate { UINT16 Size; UINT16 DialectCount; UINT16 SecurityMode = SMB2SecurityMode(this); UINT16 DialectRevision = SMB2DialectRevisionTable(this); UINT16 Reserved; ... Remove: UINT16 DialectCount; Regards, Bill Wesse MCSE, MCTS / Senior Escalation Engineer, US-CSS DSC PROTOCOL TEAM 8055 Microsoft Way Charlotte, NC 28273 TEL: +1(980) 776-8200 CELL: +1(704) 661-5438 FAX: +1(704) 665-9606 -----Original Message----- From: Bill Wesse Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2009 5:59 AM To: Steve French; Interoperability Documentation Help Cc: p...@tridgell.net; cifs-proto...@samba.org Subject: RE: [Pfif] erroneous references to little-endian Good morning Mr. French! I have created case SRX090428600004 for your question, and will begin my investigation shortly. I will keep you advised of progress! Regards, Bill Wesse MCSE, MCTS / Senior Escalation Engineer, US-CSS DSC PROTOCOL TEAM 8055 Microsoft Way Charlotte, NC 28273 TEL: +1(980) 776-8200 CELL: +1(704) 661-5438 FAX: +1(704) 665-9606 -----Original Message----- From: Steve French [mailto:smfre...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, April 27, 2009 9:14 PM To: Interoperability Documentation Help Cc: p...@tridgell.net; cifs-proto...@samba.org Subject: Re: [Pfif] erroneous references to little-endian In implementing SMB2 Negotiate protocol support I noticed that the structure definition is off by 2 bytes. Section 2.2.4 of MS-SMB2.pdf shows the SMB2 negotiate response as an SMB2 header followed by le16 StructureSize; /* Must be 65 */ le16 DialectCount; le16 SecurityMode; le16 DialectRevision; /* Should be 0x0202 */ ... etc when it actually has no "DialectCount" which is clear when decoding by hand (or looking at it in Wireshark) le16 StructureSize; /* Must be 65 */ le16 SecurityMode; le16 DialectRevision; /* Should be 0x0202 */ ... etc The server in this case is Vista. The dialect negotiated was 0x0202 in response to an SMB2 only (not SMB) negotiate protocol request. -- Thanks, Steve _______________________________________________ cifs-protocol mailing list cifs-protocol@cifs.org https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-protocol
