Hi obaid,
So we are waiting for you to provide us the exact meaning of the
SupportedEncTypes in GetDomainInfo in Netlogon RPC.
Am I right ?
Regards.
Matthieu.
On 08/15/2009 02:38 AM, Obaid Farooqi wrote:
Hi Matthieu:
I did not run the test for win 7 and WS2008R2 but code in unchanged (at the
writing of this email) so I would expect the behavior to be same as vista and
ws2008.
Regards,
Obaid Farooqi
Sr. Support Escalation Engineer | Microsoft
-----Original Message-----
From: Matthieu Patou [mailto:mat+informatique.sa...@matws.net]
Sent: Friday, August 14, 2009 3:10 PM
To: Obaid Farooqi
Cc: p...@tridgell.net; cifs-proto...@samba.org
Subject: Re: [cifs-protocol] Explain not standard behaviour of Windows 2003
server
On 08/14/2009 08:01 PM, Obaid Farooqi wrote:
Hi Matthieu:
Here is what I found out about SupportedEncTypes:
Client Server SupportedEncValue
------ ------ -----------------
WS2003 WS2008 0xffffffff
WS2008 WS2003 0x0
WS2008 WS2008 0x1f
Vista WS2008 0x1f
I'll let you know the modifications to MS-NRPC with respect to
SupportedEncTypes as soon as I have them.
I do not have the opportunity to do it test with windows 7 and windows
2008 R2 if you can investigate with this it could be great.
Matthieu.
Regards,
Obaid Farooqi
Sr. Support Escalation Engineer | Microsoft
-----Original Message-----
From: Matthieu Patou [mailto:mat+informatique.sa...@matws.net]
Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2009 10:58 AM
To: Obaid Farooqi
Cc: p...@tridgell.net; cifs-proto...@samba.org
Subject: Re: [cifs-protocol] Explain not standard behaviour of Windows 2003
server
Hi Obaid,
Find attach 2 extraction of DCERPC:
* dcerpc_w2k3 with a w2k3 DC and a w2k8 client,
* dcerpc_w2k8 with a w2k8 DC and a w2k3 client
I added an byte extraction of the GetDomainInfo reply for both. In w2k3
exchange the frame 14 is the first GetDomainInfo reply, in w2K8 it's frame 31.
Regards.
Matthieu.
On 08/11/2009 08:23 PM, Obaid Farooqi wrote:
Hi Matthieu:
Thanks for the info. One more request, please send me the traces that you
collected. As you mentioned, I'll not be able to decrypt the messages but it
will still be useful to see what messages are passing. Please also mention in
what frames you saw the issue.
Regards,
Obaid Farooqi
Sr. Support Escalation Engineer | Microsoft
-----Original Message-----
From: Matthieu Patou [mailto:m...@matws.net]
Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 12:23 AM
To: Obaid Farooqi
Cc: p...@tridgell.net; cifs-proto...@samba.org
Subject: Re: [cifs-protocol] Explain not standard behaviour of Windows
2003 server
Hello Obaid,
So I did the following tests:
W2K8 "client" with a W2K3R2 server
W2K8 "client" with a W2K8 server
All computers are setuped without any special things: I installed
windows 2003/2008 and the run a dcpromo for the dc, and then make the
"client" join the AD domain.
For the w2K3R2 server the ad level is 2000, and for w2K8 the ad level
is 2008.
I did the trace when I faced bugs with samba4 with W2K8 as a SMB
client or server, so this trace were done in order to see what's the
difference between windows 2003/2008 as a DC and samba4.
Note that I noticed the same behavior when looking at trace of other
samba team member.
Let me know if you do not see the same problem.
Matthieu.
On 08/11/2009 02:42 AM, Obaid Farooqi wrote:
Hi Matthieu:
Let's tackle it from a different angle. If you tell me your
configuration/environment and what you are exactly doing, I may be able to
reproduce this and debug Windows to see what is happening.
Please let me know details of your environment and you what are you testing.
Regards,
Obaid Farooqi
Sr. Support Escalation Engineer | Microsoft
-----Original Message-----
From: Matthieu Patou [mailto:m...@matws.net]
Sent: Monday, August 10, 2009 1:02 PM
To: Obaid Farooqi
Cc: p...@tridgell.net; cifs-proto...@samba.org
Subject: Re: Explain not standard behaviour of Windows 2003 server
Hi Obaid,
The frames are encrypted (schannel encryption).
Do you have the opportunity to rebuild a wireshark if so using my
patchs you can quite easily decrypt them of not then it's gonna be
more difficult ...
Matthieu.
On 08/10/2009 08:47 PM, Obaid Farooqi wrote:
Hi Matthieu:
Please send me the network traces for both Windows 2003 and Windows 2008.
Please also mention the number of frames that have the problem. Please also
include the information about the environment, especially client OS (DC OS is
obvious from question).
Regards,
Obaid Farooqi
Sr. Support Escalation Engineer | Microsoft
-----Original Message-----
From: Matthieu Patou [mailto:m...@matws.net]
Sent: Saturday, August 08, 2009 1:55 PM
To: p...@tridgell.net; Interoperability Documentation Help;
cifs-proto...@samba.org
Subject: Explain not standard behaviour of Windows 2003 server
Hello,
In MS-NRPC for response to GetDomainInfo the DC usually return a
NETLOGON_DOMAIN_INFO structure.
This stucture as explained in 2.2.1.3.11 contains a field called
SupportedEncTypes.
This field is definied like this:
SupportedEncTypes: A set of bit flags that specify the encryption
types supported, as specified in [MS-LSAD] section 2.2.7.18. See
[MS-LSAD] for a specification of these bit values and their allowed
combinations.
Looking at MS-LSAD we can learn that the 5th lower bit have the
following meaning:
C: Supports CRC32, as specified in [RFC3961] page 31.
M: Supports RSA-MD5, as specified in [RFC3961] page 31.
R: Supports RC4-HMAC-MD5, as specified in [RFC4757].
A: Supports HMAC-SHA1-96-AES128, as specified in [RFC3961] page 31.
S: Supports HMAC-SHA1-96-AES256, as specified in [RFC3961] page 31.
All other bits SHOULD be 0 and ignored upon receipt.
We can reasonably expect that a freshly installed windows 2003
server DC will have bit R set (RC4-HMAC-MD5).
Unfortunately it's not the case see at 0x00a4 the field is
completely null
0000 83 65 6d 02 2a 9a 4b f2 00 02 00 00 01 00 00 00 .em.*.K.........
0010 00 00 02 00 0c 00 0e 00 04 00 02 00 16 00 18 00 ................
0020 08 00 02 00 16 00 18 00 0c 00 02 00 f7 ed 67 20 ..............g
0030 9d ca e0 4d a2 51 d9 86 a4 f0 16 24 10 00 02 00 ...M.Q.....$....
0040 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
0050 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
0060 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
0070 01 00 00 00 14 00 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
0080 28 00 2a 00 28 00 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 (.*.(...........
0090 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
00a0 03 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
00b0 07 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 06 00 00 00 4d 00 53 00 ............M.S.
00c0 57 00 32 00 4b 00 33 00 0c 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 W.2.K.3.........
00d0 0b 00 00 00 6d 00 73 00 77 00 32 00 6b 00 33 00 ....m.s.w.2.k.3.
00e0 2e 00 74 00 73 00 74 00 2e 00 c5 54 0c 00 00 00 ..t.s.t....T....
00f0 00 00 00 00 0b 00 00 00 6d 00 73 00 77 00 32 00 ........m.s.w.2.
0100 6b 00 33 00 2e 00 74 00 73 00 74 00 2e 00 9e fe k.3...t.s.t.....
0110 04 00 00 00 01 04 00 00 00 00 00 05 15 00 00 00 ................
0120 86 ec 41 48 9a 49 bf 58 d1 8f f7 2b 01 00 00 00 ..AH.I.X...+....
0130 0c 00 0e 00 18 00 02 00 14 00 16 00 1c 00 02 00 ................
0140 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 f7 ed 67 20 9d ca e0 4d ..........g ...M
0150 a2 51 d9 86 a4 f0 16 24 20 00 02 00 10 00 10 00 .Q.....$ .......
0160 24 00 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 $...............
0170 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
0180 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 07 00 00 00 ................
0190 00 00 00 00 06 00 00 00 4d 00 53 00 57 00 32 00 ........M.S.W.2.
01a0 4b 00 33 00 0b 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0a 00 00 00 K.3.............
01b0 6d 00 73 00 77 00 32 00 6b 00 33 00 2e 00 74 00 m.s.w.2.k.3...t.
01c0 73 00 74 00 04 00 00 00 01 04 00 00 00 00 00 05 s.t.............
01d0 15 00 00 00 86 ec 41 48 9a 49 bf 58 d1 8f f7 2b ......AH.I.X...+
01e0 08 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 08 00 00 00 0d 00 00 00 ................
01f0 00 00 00 00 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 15 00 00 00 ................
0200 00 00 00 00 14 00 00 00 73 00 6d 00 62 00 61 00 ........s.m.b.a.
0210 73 00 76 00 7a 00 30 00 34 00 2e 00 6d 00 73 00 s.v.z.0.4...m.s.
0220 77 00 32 00 6b 00 33 00 2e 00 74 00 73 00 74 00 w.2.k.3...t.s.t.
0230 00 00 00 00 ....
With a windows 2008 server it's not better because I have 0xffffffff.
Can you explain this situation ?
Thanks.
Matthieu Patou.
_______________________________________________
cifs-protocol mailing list
cifs-protocol@cifs.org
https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-protocol
_______________________________________________
cifs-protocol mailing list
cifs-protocol@cifs.org
https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-protocol