Hello Hongwei,

So the attached pcap show dfs referral traffic between a S4 and XP hosts.

Where we can see that XP is requesting a level 4 referral and that S4 answers to it with an answer following the specification.

After this XP is blocked or fallback to NTLM auth (not shown in this capture but in this one: http://www.matws.net/mat/misc/dfs2.pcap.gz).

So I'm wondering if it's normal, maybe XP didn't appreciate the level 4 answers.

Matthieu.

On 19/05/2011 20:23, Hongwei Sun wrote:
Hi, Matthieu,

    I need some clarification about your question.  I have a problem to match 
the packets to what you have described.    The trace has only  6 packets.  The 
following are all the packets in the trace:

1       3:28:33 PM 5/17/2011    0.0000000       172.16.101.16   172.16.101.1    DFSC  
  DFSC:Get DFS Referral Request, FileName:<empty>, MaxReferralLevel: 3
2       3:28:33 PM 5/17/2011    0.0001600       172.16.101.1    172.16.101.16   
DFSC    DFSC:Get DFS Referral Response, NumberOfReferrals: 2 VersionNumber: 3
3       3:28:33 PM 5/17/2011    0.1360020       172.16.101.16   172.16.101.1    
DFSC    DFSC:Get DFS Referral Request, FileName: \w2k8r2.home.matws.net, 
MaxReferralLevel: 3
4       3:28:33 PM 5/17/2011    0.1434180       172.16.101.1    172.16.101.16   
DFSC    DFSC:Get DFS Referral Response, NumberOfReferrals: 1 VersionNumber: 3
5       3:28:33 PM 5/17/2011    0.1440790       172.16.101.16   172.16.101.1    
DFSC    DFSC:Get DFS Referral Request, FileName: \w2k8r2.home.matws.net\sysvol, 
MaxReferralLevel: 4
6       3:28:33 PM 5/17/2011    0.1514540       172.16.101.1    172.16.101.16   
DFSC    DFSC:Get DFS Referral Response, NumberOfReferrals: 2 VersionNumber: 4

    Could you explain more about the configuration of your testing , scenario 
as well as the behavior in question?    It will be better if you can point out 
the packets in question.

Thanks!

Hongwei


-----Original Message-----
From: cifs-protocol-boun...@cifs.org [mailto:cifs-protocol-boun...@cifs.org] On 
Behalf Of Matthieu Patou
Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2011 4:09 PM
To: Interoperability Documentation Help; p...@tridgell.net; 
cifs-proto...@samba.org
Subject: [cifs-protocol] dfs referral for sysvol and windows XP

Hello doc help,

While revisiting the DFS implementation for samba I remade some tests with XP 
and It seems that when doing the last step in order to resolve 
\\domain.tld\sysvol.
Even if we tend to send the same frame, XP comes to samba 4 when asking for a 
DC holding \\domain.tld\sysvol. So as we support this level we return entry for 
this level.

But then it fails to connect to \\dc.domain.tld\sysvol and keep doing ntlm 
connection to \\domain.tld\sysvol.

Is this "normal" ?

I put another capture here: http://www.matws.net/mat/misc/dfs2.pcap.gz
where we can clearly see that the client starts to do NTLM auth to connect to 
\\domain.tld.

Thanks for your answers.

Matthieu.

--
Matthieu Patou
Samba Team        http://samba.org
Private repo      http://git.samba.org/?p=mat/samba.git;a=summary




--
Matthieu Patou
Samba Team        http://samba.org
Private repo      http://git.samba.org/?p=mat/samba.git;a=summary


_______________________________________________
cifs-protocol mailing list
cifs-protocol@cifs.org
https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-protocol

Reply via email to