Hi Matthieu: I'll help you with this issue and would be in touch as soon as I have an answer.
Regards, Obaid Farooqi Escalation Engineer | Microsoft Exceeding your expectations is my highest priority. If you would like to provide feedback on your case you may contact my manager at allis...@microsoft.com -----Original Message----- From: Matthieu Patou [mailto:m...@samba.org] Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2011 6:09 PM To: Interoperability Documentation Help; p...@tridgell.net; cifs-proto...@samba.org Subject: FRS clarification about VVJOIN in FRS Hello Dochelp, I have some problems to understand something in the join process related to VVJOIN. In paragraph "3.3.4.4.4 COMM_COMMAND Is CMD_JOINING" we have at the end After the CMD_JOINED packet is sent: * If a connection VVJoin needs to be performed, FRS MUST go through the process specified in the following section. * If a connection VVJoin does not need to be performed, the upstream partner MUST send unknown change orders to the downstream partner based on the downstream partner version vector. And in paragraph "3.3.4.4.4.1 Connection VVJoin" FRS MUST perform Connection VVJoin when either of the following conditions is true: * P_IN.COMM_LAST_JOIN_TIME is 1. * Last connection session establishment (Join) time of the outbound connection is 1. During VVJoin, the upstream partner MUST send out a CMD_REMOTE_CO packet for each file Due to the way FRS1 is redacted I understand that the upstream partner when receiving a packet with a CMD_JOINING (P_IN) it must check what is described at 3.3.4.4.4.1in order to determine if should do a "simple" join or a VVJoin. Among the condition to determine if the join should be VVJoin I have the impression that the condition "P_IN.COMM_LAST_JOIN_TIME is 1." is always true, as if I understand correctly P_IN referrer to the packet with the CMD_JOINING command and in paragraph "3.3.4.4.3 COMM_COMMAND Is CMD_START_JOIN", which describe how the next packet that is to say a packet with CMD_JOINING, it is said that COMM_LAST_JOIN_TIME must be set to 1. Can you confirm ? Also I'd like to understand more what "unknown change orders to the downstream partner based on the downstream partner version vector." means, and if possible I'd like to have an example. Thanks. Matthieu. -- Matthieu Patou Samba Team http://samba.org Private repo http://git.samba.org/?p=mat/samba.git;a=summary Microsoft is committed to protecting your privacy. Please read the Microsoft Privacy Statement for more information.The above is an email for a support case from Microsoft Corp.REPLY ALL TO THIS MESSAGE or INCLUDE casem...@microsoft.com IN YOUR REPLY if you want your response added to the case automatically. For technical assistance, please include the Support Engineer on the TO: line. Thank you. _______________________________________________ cifs-protocol mailing list cifs-protocol@cifs.org https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-protocol
