Metze, Slight change in plan to load balance on this side: my colleague Edgar (copied) will help you on this issue.
Bryan -----Original Message----- From: Bryan Burgin Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 1:17 PM To: 'Stefan (metze) Metzmacher' Cc: p...@tridgell.net; cifs-protocol@cifs.org; MSSolve Case Email Subject: [REG:112080864018345] SMB3 encryption over multiple requests [dochelp to bcc] [adding case number and casemail] Hi Metze, We created the case 112080864018345 to track this issue, which I will help you with. Thanks. Bryan -----Original Message----- From: Stefan (metze) Metzmacher [mailto:me...@samba.org] Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 9:38 AM To: Interoperability Documentation Help Cc: p...@tridgell.net; cifs-protocol@cifs.org Subject: SMB3 encryption over multiple requests Hi, I just found out that windows2012 RC sends multiple compound requests within just one encrypted SMB2_TRANSFORM message. >From reading [MS-SMB2] version 37.0 I had the impression that each request >would be encrypted on its own, similar to how signing works. Can the other receiver side rely on the fact that all messages within a SMB2_TRANSFORM message belong to the same session as the session (referenced by the session id in the SMB2_TRANSFORM header) used for the encryption? What will happen if a client send unrelated compound requests? What about async responses with STATUS_PENDING, are they also encrypted? How does it work, when the last request in a compound chain goes async? Are Oplock/Lease Break Notifications encrypted? Can there be more than one SMB2_TRANSFORM message within a transport layer message? metze _______________________________________________ cifs-protocol mailing list cifs-protocol@cifs.org https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-protocol
