First of all, I apologize for getting into the conversation. I see that you are working on the issue of speed change. Precisely these days playing with the change of speed I have encountered some more problems. For example, if there are effects inserted to the clip or track that I apply a speed change, they lose synchrony.
The line is a good option, but I see that it is very problematic. Wouldn't it be easier to make an effect, or assistant, that acts on the time of a certain clip? Let me explain, if I have a clip that lasts 10 seconds at 30 frames per second, I have a 300-frame clip and each frame lasts 33.33 milliseconds. If through an effect I tell it that each frame lasts for example 66.66 the result is that this clip will last twice as long and will go in slow motion, however if I indicate that each frame last 16.66 the clip will go to twice as fast, that is fast camera. It is NOT an assistant in which I dedicate myself to changing times, this would be internally, the assistant can simply be a fader, equal to the current assistant to change values to keyframes. I think this would simplify things a lot and it is really what we are used to finding in a video editor. Cinelerra is a very good editor. The problem is that nowadays speed changes are used a lot, the current line is a very good option in many cases, but I think it would be easier with an effect that instead of acting on the track acts on a single clip. A clip that we can define with cuts if we only want to change the speed to a fragment of it. Greetings and thank you very much for the excellent work. El mié., 26 ago. 2020 a las 14:01, Andrea paz via Cin (< cin@lists.cinelerra-gg.org>) escribió: > Thanks for fix. The action of the changes (via slider) on the curve of > one track is now also transmitted to the curves of the other tracks. > Igor's first problem is also solved, but I confirm the second problem > he detected. > 1- what happens if there are keyframes within the bump interval? It > seems to me that they become bump keyframes too, so the interval > designed by us is reduced to several intervals between close autos. > 2- When you set the right edge keyframe (edge and span), you also > change the left edge keyframe. And vice versa. In my opinion it would > be better to make them independent because it could happen that the > effect of the curve expands also to the next or previous edits (2th > problem of IgorBeg?). With the independent settings you can narrow the > range perfectly, with the left autos set on the right and the right > autos set on the left. As it is now they are both set to left or > right. I understand that my request goes against the functioning of > the bump autos, maybe it is better not to take it into account. > 3- The autos handlers give boredom, confuse the curve if there are > other keyframes and are unusable to make changes to the autos (which > can only be done with sliders). Is it possible to delete them or at > least not see them? > -- > Cin mailing list > Cin@lists.cinelerra-gg.org > https://lists.cinelerra-gg.org/mailman/listinfo/cin >
-- Cin mailing list Cin@lists.cinelerra-gg.org https://lists.cinelerra-gg.org/mailman/listinfo/cin