On Monday 29 May 2006 02:48 pm, Johannes Sixt wrote: > On Monday 29 May 2006 19:27, Joe Stewart wrote: > > On Monday 29 May 2006 12:50 pm, Andraz Tori wrote: > > > I am bit on the shaky grounds here, since i don't know what is acutally > > > happening... > > > > > > > > > Couldn't you do it by just using frames to fields and reframe plugins? > > > > Are you talking about setting asset fps to 15, project fps to 30, and > > then reframeRT at 0.8 scale? It makes an approximation but it wouldn't be > > smooth and it wouldn't be rendered at 24fps. What you end up with is a > > pseudo-24fps 30fps file which repeats every 4th frame to fill the time. > > No. > > Render Fields-To-Frames to a new file. Then import it. In the assets, > specify that it is 24fps. Make your project frame rate also to 24fps.
Right, which is the render and reimport 2-step method I was trying to avoid. BTW, do you mean Fields-to-Frames or Frames-to-Fields? Because these plugins seem to work backwards of what I would expect given their names. As it works now, Frames-to-Fields takes alternating fields from the asset and makes frames in the timeline. Which seems to suggest it would be better named Frames-from-Fields. Or am I just thinking about it wrong? -Joe _______________________________________________ Cinelerra mailing list Cinelerra@skolelinux.no https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
