On Wed, 15 Aug 2007, marquitux caballero wrote: > when I talk about the effects, I MEAN THE EFFECTS, nos just the ICONS, come > on, I agree, those HORRIBLE year old boy drawings, ARE NOT THE PROBLEM, I > mean REALLY, THE EFFECTS ITSELF > are TERRIBLE in cinelerra, this is what I meant: > http://cowcast.creativecow.net/after_effects/index.html > > look the way the effects are applied, and the general workflow, is GREAT, > but still...
So please enlighten me. You have found a great tool named Adobe Aftereffects. You bought it legally and use it in your daily work. Now I wonder, why do you look at another tool, and start to complain about it? Instead of giving a hands-on guide to make it better, or even make it better yourself. Seriously it is nice that technically Cinelerra can capture movies using the V4L interface. But I am *never* using this because of the worst possible performance. Do you really think I use Cinelerra to cut 10 seconds of an excisting movie? No @[EMAIL PROTECTED] way, I use ffmpeg for that. The effects I played with in Cinelerra were for audio, and I could do a much better job with specific tools for it. And I really see no need what so ever to use effects as "Delay TV" or what so ever in any production. Now in my way of editing I could probably use ffmpeg to stich every scene to eachother and get a nice file out of it. But I find it nice to see what I am doing and like to make some sweeps etc. So if you think the effects in Cinelerra are terrible, don't use them. I actually think some of them are very cool especially the live Chroma-keying. http://heroinewarrior.com/chromakey.jpg Stefan _______________________________________________ Cinelerra mailing list Cinelerra@skolelinux.no https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
