On Sun, 30 Dec 2007 03:47:23 +0100, Terje J. Hanssen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Herman Robak wrote on Sat, 29 Dec 2007
...
Interesting, but pricey.

Yes, also my (first) impression, somewhat pricy, about 10k NOK incl.vat
http://www.macrovideo.no/wwwDatavideo/datavideopriser.htm

 That was less than I expected. (I only found a lesser model at B&H)

I would have been tempted if it came with a battery.

I guess not what you think of, but by adding 12% to its price there is a
DC Stabilizer DDC–1512 for DN-300 so that it can be used with a
unregulated 12V batteries, cigarette lighters or 12V supplies
http://www.datavideo.us/products/dc_stabilizer_main_page.htm

 Probably too bulky and heavy for the rucksack.  A device that uses
FAT and split files at 2GB had better be _light_.  But you don't need
this box in the field, right?


  Sure.  Cinelerra can open several files at a time, which makes this
pesky splitting less annoying.  Still I would like some file system
backend (an KDE ioslave or equivalent, maybe?) to lump such files
together to hide this kludge.


Conclusion:

And me that thought I had found the "default solution" that I could
trust would work easy and flawless recording DV and HDV on, avoiding any
capturing problems using dvgrab :)

Therefore again, do you advice against it(s file structure) or will you
possibly say that DN-300 looks to be a useful solutin for the described
purpose?

 For you the file splitting can be a minor issue.  If you have a large
scratch disk (USB, IDE, whatever) and you don't need the results very
soon, combining the files is a matter of clever scripting.

 However, if this transfer from Video8 is a once in a lifetime project,
the Datavideo DN-300 seems a little overkill...

--
Herman Robak

_______________________________________________
Cinelerra mailing list
Cinelerra@skolelinux.no
https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra

Reply via email to