Hi!

Though I'm definitely not a coder (OK, a bit Python once in a while), I
follow this list closely, especially all the Lumiera related stuff. And
whenever things like "let's do X by using Y" come up, I hear litte alarm
bells ring in my head. I always fear that Y - though it means to reuse
existing functionality, which is a good thing - might be some hard to
port/compile/configure, non-standard way of doing things.

Marcin Kostur wrote:
> [...]
> ...the jack is another story

Jack is one of those red blankets. All major distros are on their move
to pulseaudio right now. As I understand it, the functionality is
similar to what jack provides (correct me if I'm wrong). So although in
this case, there is a really handy app - Ardour - that uses jack, I
don't think this should bring in jack automatically for Lumiera sound
backend, too. Well, it could, as long as there is a pulseaudio backend,
too ;)

Reuse is good, but reusing something that already is a duplication of
existing functionality is not.

But that's only from my limited (user) perspective. Let those decide who
code.


Andreas

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to