On Tuesday 24 June 2008 16:07:42 Stefan de Konink wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] schreef:
> > On Tue, 24 Jun 2008, Stefan de Konink wrote:
> >> It is not better, because technically you are using a copyrighted name
> >> for something that is not that name.
> >
> > Names cannot be copyrighted.
>
> Dutch law disagrees on that. Everything anyone can think of falls on the
> respectable private copyright laws. So if you think of a cool name in
> combination with a specific function. That name + that function are
> owned by you, if you were the first.

trademark != copyright

Is Cinelerra registered as trademark by Heroinewarrior?


pseudoruprecht

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Reply via email to