On Sat, 2008-12-13 at 11:55 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > > On my month old build of Fedora 9, x86-64, I'm using ATrpms for a small set > > of, but very important, Cinelerra dependencies, sixteen programs in all: > Could you give the same kind of tests with F-10 x86_64 and RPM Fusion > i bet you won't have any others issues > (if you pick the cinelerra-cv package from my own repository) > > The problem with ATrpms is that there is only one person behind, and > he lacks time raising compilation problem upstream. Instead, RPM > Fusion is community maintained and contributors are working with > merging their patches upstream. So the RPM Fusion works will also > benefit to others and will allow a better knowledge base, when > answering possible bug reports. (usually). > > I doubt anyone having a comprehensive understanding of the difference > between each of theses repository will pick even one package from > ATrpms. > > Nicolas (kwizart) Hi Nicolas, You make some good points. I did read about Fusion here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Interviews/RPMFusion
It seems like a very good idea to reduce the number of third party repositories..less confusion and stepping on each others toes. As I just built out the Fedora 9 system and got it working fairly seemlessly, I'm a little wary of jumping to 10. This weekend, I'll be creating backup images of Fedora 9 boot/root. Having an image of my current system that I can always rollback to is a start to feeling more comfortable about making the jump to 10. I'll let you know how things go as I make progress. scott _______________________________________________ Cinelerra mailing list Cinelerra@skolelinux.no https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
