Hello Daniel: > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:cisco-nsp- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Daniel Roesen > Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2007 4:11 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] unwanted "arp reply" traffic at IX > > On Sun, Nov 18, 2007 at 02:23:57AM +0100, Daniel Roesen wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 18, 2007 at 12:33:55AM +0100, Daniel Roesen wrote: > > > Router#sh run | i prox > > > ip arp proxy disable > > > Router#sh run int g0/1 | i prox > > > Router#sh ip int g0/1 | i Prox > > > Proxy ARP is enabled > > > > > > I've verified that proxy ARP is actually disabled. Just opened a > > > TAC case for that. > > Actually, Cisco now refuses to fix this. The DDTS ID I got at first was > wrong too (not even for IOS). > > Cisco's (at least "the developers, tech leads and escalations > engineers" > final word is that this behaviour is not a bug but intended behaviour. > > SR #607332831 for anyone who has more weight to cluebat them > appropriately. I'm giving up. > > Best regards, > Daniel (shaking head in deep disbelieve how disconnected some vendors > are from real world users)
We had a similar issue at the Seattle Internet Exchange and a "no ip gratuitous-arps" at the global config level helped significantly. I know it doesn't address your issue above, but it may help in other ways. Regards, Mike
PGP.sig
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
