It would be interesting to hear from this community what you think about:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-farinacci-lisp-06.txt http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-fuller-lisp-alt-00.txt http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-lewis-lisp-interworking-00.txt Thanks in advance for considering, Dino On Apr 2, 2008, at 7:13 AM, Gert Doering wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 04:29:13PM +0300, Ziv Leyes wrote: >> I want to set an appointment with you in, let's say 10 years from >> today and we can talk it over again? >> Do you know how many of the IPv4 "allocated" addresses aren't >> actually in use and are only held at the LIRs and RIRs IP "storage >> basement" for future use? >> This could happen in the future too, a single person can apply for >> a million IPv6 addresses and perhaps he will get them, because >> "there are som many, so what the heck, let him have 'em?" >> We'll see, I hope I'm wrong? > > Actually every user of IPv6 *will* get "millions" (2^64...2^80, > depending > on ISP assignment size). That's the point. > > Before making public claims like yours, try to read up a bit on what > the > current approaches *are*, and how the numbers work out. > > "IPv6 won't work!" (and its variants) isn't going to stop IPv4 > depletion - > get over it, and start helping to fix the remaining open issues around > IPv6. "Not enough addresses" isn't one of them. Non-deployment is. > > gert > > -- > USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW! > //www.muc.de/~gert/ > Gert Doering - Munich, Germany [EMAIL PROTECTED] > fax: +49-89-35655025 [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/