> -----Original Message----- > From: Dale W. Carder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 4:56 AM > To: Ted Mittelstaedt > Cc: Gert Doering; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] OT : IPv6 - Will it hit like an "avalanch"? > > > > And with IPv6, because the globally-significant part of the number > > is only on the router, if the organization is properly setup, > > renumbering is a snap, so the poor excuse that renumbering labor > > would be so high as to justify not renumbering isn't available. > > That renumbering would be a snap is only true if you > ignore real-world issues like DNS, firewalls, ACL's, etc. > You can only push ULA addressing so far and we'll be > back to NATing IPv6. >
I agree which is why I do not see any end to address translators. I think that every CEO of any networking startup company needs to get it through their heads that any products they bring to market MUST work behind a translator. I know this will probably disappoint a number of people who were looking forward to building products that would be able to directly access all IPv6 devices on the Internet, but too bad. Ted _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
