Hi, On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 10:37:10AM +0200, Mohacsi Janos wrote: > Probably we have to ask the 7600 BU to improve their software and take > decisions that make sense: > - They should improve quality of the IOS softwares!! - I have heard that > SRD will be tested more thoroughly... But currently Cisco 7600 BU played > on the customer loyalty... and exploited their inability to change. > - Cisco 7600 BU should go something similar to safe harbour.... > - They (6500 BU and 7600 BU) should support all new supervisor cards... > RSP720 is not supported in 6500 and sup720-10GE series not supported in > 7600. This is nonsense!
Indeed. Worse, they are now building increasingly different chassis types
with different capabilities - 6500-E with "lots of power", and 7600-S with
"nice and shiny high-availability EOBC" (if I understand the differences
right).
> - They can distinguish certain cards to be supported on Cisco 6500 or
> Cisco 7600 according the market segment.
> -LAN type switchingcards should be supported on both C7600 and C6500.... -
> fabric enabled with *720* and non fabric enabled with sup32* and *720*
I agree with you - this would make sense, and give back the feeling that
Cisco is a dependable business partner.
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany [EMAIL PROTECTED]
fax: +49-89-35655025 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgp6bKndLZBEB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
